Well, I don't mind sharing, but for the same reason man will not accomplish the most basic and important things, is the same reason most men will not believe the most basic and simple truths.
So, rather than go from simple to complex, I'll do the reverse.
Take a look around, and take a moment to ponder.
What makes man big?
His skyscrapers? His money? His military artillery? His ego?
Are you seeing the picture I'm seeing?
I see a picture of a significantly small creature - with significantly little power. The greatest thing man can do is destroy himself - if that makes sense.
What is man against one of the tiniest of creatures, or more specifically - one of the tiniest organisms.
The mosquito is so tiny, and a virus - tinier - in fact the tiniest of it's kind... so far.
Anyway, I don't want to bore you with a long talk, so I will speed along.
The tiniest things, man don't even seem to be able to defeat.
What is he against little above tiny?
How about when the stakes are raised? What we call,
the forces of nature.
And then there is the bigger things we don't even see.
What is he now?
Do you realize that all these forces seem to work in an organized way - magnetism etc.
The power in nature is vastly superior to man who becomes like a drop in a bucket.
Now for the simple.
The insignificant creature can build. He can build starting with the basic - a house.
Yet everything else including him, had no builder - no designer. Makes sense?
Actually, no science supports this.
When we look at man's design, we see there is always purpose for the design, and his design tells us a lot about him - the designer.
Yet natures design tells us that it had no designer. Makes sense?
To me. No.
From the most insignificant, to the most significant, everything tells us it owns it's existence to a designer.
There is purpose in every design, and we can learn much from the design about the designer.
This makes sense to me.
Romans 1:20
.
..God’s invisible qualities, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly observed in what he made. As a result, people have no excuse.
Hebrews 3:4
After all, every house has a builder, but the builder of everything is God.
Now you ask some questions - worth answering.
So who created the creater? If everything must have a creator more intelligent than itself, then something more intelligent than your god must exist.
I think you already know the answer to this.
In geometry, a shape is made up of - could be, lines, triangles, quads - depending on what the shape is.
The bottom line is though, the most basic shape construct - a line - is made up of points, or a series of points.
However, can anything exist without a point? No. In order to get any shape you need to start with a point, but we never question what makes up a point, do we?
We accept that an exact location in space must be called, in order for us to get our shape.
It is pointless questioning who created the creator.
So onto the next...
If something can exist without an intelligent creator, then the cosmos can also be that thing.
So let's have the cosmos always existed then.
Now I leave that for the science guys to battle out What If the Big Bang Wasn't the Beginning? New Study Proposes Alternative
Are you going to give it an intelligence? 'Cause my question is, how did it become ordered, and how did different forms of matter exist without a cause?
According to science, energy always existed, but matter in its various forms - How?
I suppose you are going to ask me how did my God exist in his current state. Well, my answer to that is, things of which my simple mortal mind cannot comprehend, I do not pretend to know, or understand.
So if the universe is your maker, and that makes you happy...
We only have evidence for natural means so far.
Of course, since you accept that the house doesn't require a builder, since it made itself.
First you have to provide evidence of a god's existence, and then you can argue over what it may or may not have created.
I did. What do you want me do do now. I have never seen anything build itself. Have you? Show me.
If that's not evidence enough, then you might need to take a closer look at the design. What do we do with it. Copy every thing we possible can. Yet you insist it had no maker. That's not what I observe every single day of my life.
Neither does science - We observe builders even in the tiniest in the animal kingdom.
Like I said before. There is a reason why most men will not believe the most basic and simple truths.
If you want to disprove cosmology and evolution, you must take all of the accumulated data and fit it into a theory of creation without doing damage to any of it and not cherry picking the bits you like. Why is no such theory ever offered up?
I don't have to accept data that can't be proven, and based on inconclusive theories. Why should I?
