• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Zero Probability of Evolution. Atheism wrong?

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I agree. It's not just without God, it's without a moral code or ethical compass. You have a strong moral code, I just point out its axiomatic nature, its God-derived nature, the problem with having such a code without a God and with mindless evolution that says, "enhance survivability" and etc.
Then I find your opinion on the subject terrifying.

If you are unaware that raping or murdering another human being is a wrong action, without some deity telling you that you shouldn't do it, I have to wonder what is wrong with you. Where is your moral compass and why do you need orders from above in order to recognize that murder and rape are wrong actions? Gee, how would anybody ever know that molesting children is wrong or keeping human beings as slaves is wrong, given that the Bible doesn't bother to say so? You really think that's a difficult concept to figure out?

Christopher Hitchens said it like this:

"The test I apply in my book, a fairly good, pragmatic, American test, is what do you do when no one's looking? The fact is someone is looking. You have an internal conversation with yourself where you don't want to look or feel bad. I don't think this comes from God. I think it comes as part of our evolution. Darwin points out, and others have noticed since, that there are animals who behave ethically to one another. They have solidarity; they have family groups; they seem able to feel sympathy; they certainly come to each other's aid, in the case of some of the higher mammals. I think our morality evolved, and I don't believe that my Jewish ancestors thought that perjury and murder and theft were okay until they got to Mount Sinai and were told no dice."
Hitchens Debates Transcripts: Hitchens vs. Roberts, Hugh Hewitt Show
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You are correct, it is not just to punish someone who lived and entirely selfless life. Do you know such a person who isn't Jesus Christ?
Please try to concentrate. The punishment for jaywalking should not be the same as the punishment for child rape. That is where Christianity fails.
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
What is vaguely funny is how people can find whatever they choose to find in ye Bible. Justification for slavery? A cinch. "Gnosis" was up to date with
modern physics? It's all there.
Gnosis is NOT the Bible. It is the Spirit revealing knowledge to the mind. The Jews never had or knew the "gnosis" Christ taught. The Bible divides (God) more than it teaches of him.
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
4 things:

1)You're about to make an argument from ignorance in defense of Theism - Because you don't know something, that means maybe God did it... Am I right? God of the Gaps seems to be the modern theist's favorite deity.

2)A god of the gaps argument does not make deities are any more likely than when I first responded to this thread. Being unable to differentiate between an infinitely complex being and natural phenomenon does nothing to support the existence claim for the complex being.

3)I'd like you to directly quote those scriptures for me.

3) Time isn't Universal and it never has been - not even in our own Galaxy... What Hawkings is saying is nothing new. It has been long theorized in Cosmology that any existence outside of our Universe would not necessarily conform to the same rules that exist within our Universe. We are bound by this existence; not by another. In that same vein, a Multiverse would mean that our branch of seeming infinity would be just one of many, which necessarily requires that time existed before our branch of space came into being, and that it could be completely different to our own. It could also be identical...
What Christ taught was based on faith and "hope". A Christian "hopes" in God. An Atheist "hopes" God doesn't exist. There is no knowing, only faith (in what we see).

The scripture you want to see cannot be found in the Bible.

"And I asked to know it, and he said to me, "The Monad is a monarchy with nothing above it. It is he who exists as God and Father of everything, the invisible One who is above everything, who exists as incorruption, which is in the pure light into which no eye can look.

"He is the invisible Spirit, of whom it is not right to think of him as a god, or something similar. For he is more than a god, since there is nothing above him, for no one lords it over him. For he does not exist in something inferior to him, since everything exists in him. For it is he who establishes himself. He is eternal, since he does not need anything. For he is total perfection. He did not lack anything, that he might be completed by it; rather he is always completely perfect in light. He is illimitable, since there is no one prior to him to set limits to him. He is unsearchable, since there exists no one prior to him to examine him. He is immeasurable, since there was no one prior to him to measure him. He is invisible, since no one saw him. He is eternal, since he exists eternally. He is ineffable, since no one was able to comprehend him to speak about him. He is unnameable, since there is no one prior to him to give him a name.

"He is immeasurable light, which is pure, holy (and) immaculate. He is ineffable, being perfect in incorruptibility. (He is) not in perfection, nor in blessedness, nor in divinity, but he is far superior. He is not corporeal nor is he incorporeal. He is neither large nor is he small. There is no way to say, 'What is his quantity?' or, 'What is his quality?', for no one can know him. He is not someone among (other) beings, rather he is far superior. Not that he is (simply) superior, but his essence does not partake in the aeons nor in time. For he who partakes in an aeon was prepared beforehand. Time was not apportioned to him, since he does not receive anything from another, for it would be received on loan. For he who precedes someone does not lack, that he may receive from him. For rather, it is the latter that looks expectantly at him in his light.

"For the perfection is majestic. He is pure, immeasurable mind. He is an aeon-giving aeon. He is life-giving life. He is a blessedness-giving blessed one. He is knowledge-giving knowledge. He is goodness-giving goodness. He is mercy and redemption-giving mercy. He is grace-giving grace, not because he possesses it, but because he gives the immeasurable, incomprehensible light.

"How am I to speak with you about him? His aeon is indestructible, at rest and existing in silence, reposing (and) being prior to everything. For he is the head of all the aeons, and it is he who gives them strength in his goodness. For we know not the ineffable things, and we do not understand what is immeasurable, except for him who came forth from him, namely (from) the Father. For it is he who told it to us alone. For it is he who looks at himself in his light which surrounds him, namely the spring of the water of life. And it is he who gives to all the aeons and in every way, (and) who gazes upon his image which he sees in the spring of the Spirit. It is he who puts his desire in his water-light which is in the spring of the pure light-water which surrounds him."- Secret Book of John

The teaching matches what Jesus taught, over the orthodox view of God using the OT. It moves beyond the Biblical (physical) view of God. The view can only be an image in mind through spiritual (gnosis) rather than what the mind see's through eyes and ears.

My perception through seeking.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
What Christ taught was based on faith and "hope". A Christian "hopes" in God. An Atheist "hopes" God doesn't exist. There is no knowing, only faith (in what we see).

The scripture you want to see cannot be found in the Bible.

"And I asked to know it, and he said to me, "The Monad is a monarchy with nothing above it. It is he who exists as God and Father of everything, the invisible One who is above everything, who exists as incorruption, which is in the pure light into which no eye can look.

"He is the invisible Spirit, of whom it is not right to think of him as a god, or something similar. For he is more than a god, since there is nothing above him, for no one lords it over him. For he does not exist in something inferior to him, since everything exists in him. For it is he who establishes himself. He is eternal, since he does not need anything. For he is total perfection. He did not lack anything, that he might be completed by it; rather he is always completely perfect in light. He is illimitable, since there is no one prior to him to set limits to him. He is unsearchable, since there exists no one prior to him to examine him. He is immeasurable, since there was no one prior to him to measure him. He is invisible, since no one saw him. He is eternal, since he exists eternally. He is ineffable, since no one was able to comprehend him to speak about him. He is unnameable, since there is no one prior to him to give him a name.

"He is immeasurable light, which is pure, holy (and) immaculate. He is ineffable, being perfect in incorruptibility. (He is) not in perfection, nor in blessedness, nor in divinity, but he is far superior. He is not corporeal nor is he incorporeal. He is neither large nor is he small. There is no way to say, 'What is his quantity?' or, 'What is his quality?', for no one can know him. He is not someone among (other) beings, rather he is far superior. Not that he is (simply) superior, but his essence does not partake in the aeons nor in time. For he who partakes in an aeon was prepared beforehand. Time was not apportioned to him, since he does not receive anything from another, for it would be received on loan. For he who precedes someone does not lack, that he may receive from him. For rather, it is the latter that looks expectantly at him in his light.

"For the perfection is majestic. He is pure, immeasurable mind. He is an aeon-giving aeon. He is life-giving life. He is a blessedness-giving blessed one. He is knowledge-giving knowledge. He is goodness-giving goodness. He is mercy and redemption-giving mercy. He is grace-giving grace, not because he possesses it, but because he gives the immeasurable, incomprehensible light.

"How am I to speak with you about him? His aeon is indestructible, at rest and existing in silence, reposing (and) being prior to everything. For he is the head of all the aeons, and it is he who gives them strength in his goodness. For we know not the ineffable things, and we do not understand what is immeasurable, except for him who came forth from him, namely (from) the Father. For it is he who told it to us alone. For it is he who looks at himself in his light which surrounds him, namely the spring of the water of life. And it is he who gives to all the aeons and in every way, (and) who gazes upon his image which he sees in the spring of the Spirit. It is he who puts his desire in his water-light which is in the spring of the pure light-water which surrounds him."- Secret Book of John

The teaching matches what Jesus taught, over the orthodox view of God using the OT. It moves beyond the Biblical (physical) view of God. The view can only be an image in mind through spiritual (gnosis) rather than what the mind see's through eyes and ears.

My perception through seeking.

Why on earth should we take anything you say seriously when you lead off with something ridiculous that you just made up?

An Atheist "hopes" God doesn't exist.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
What Christ taught was based on faith and "hope". A Christian "hopes" in God. An Atheist "hopes" God doesn't exist. There is no knowing, only faith (in what we see).

The scripture you want to see cannot be found in the Bible.

"And I asked to know it, and he said to me, "The Monad is a monarchy with nothing above it. It is he who exists as God and Father of everything, the invisible One who is above everything, who exists as incorruption, which is in the pure light into which no eye can look.

"He is the invisible Spirit, of whom it is not right to think of him as a god, or something similar. For he is more than a god, since there is nothing above him, for no one lords it over him. For he does not exist in something inferior to him, since everything exists in him. For it is he who establishes himself. He is eternal, since he does not need anything. For he is total perfection. He did not lack anything, that he might be completed by it; rather he is always completely perfect in light. He is illimitable, since there is no one prior to him to set limits to him. He is unsearchable, since there exists no one prior to him to examine him. He is immeasurable, since there was no one prior to him to measure him. He is invisible, since no one saw him. He is eternal, since he exists eternally. He is ineffable, since no one was able to comprehend him to speak about him. He is unnameable, since there is no one prior to him to give him a name.

"He is immeasurable light, which is pure, holy (and) immaculate. He is ineffable, being perfect in incorruptibility. (He is) not in perfection, nor in blessedness, nor in divinity, but he is far superior. He is not corporeal nor is he incorporeal. He is neither large nor is he small. There is no way to say, 'What is his quantity?' or, 'What is his quality?', for no one can know him. He is not someone among (other) beings, rather he is far superior. Not that he is (simply) superior, but his essence does not partake in the aeons nor in time. For he who partakes in an aeon was prepared beforehand. Time was not apportioned to him, since he does not receive anything from another, for it would be received on loan. For he who precedes someone does not lack, that he may receive from him. For rather, it is the latter that looks expectantly at him in his light.

"For the perfection is majestic. He is pure, immeasurable mind. He is an aeon-giving aeon. He is life-giving life. He is a blessedness-giving blessed one. He is knowledge-giving knowledge. He is goodness-giving goodness. He is mercy and redemption-giving mercy. He is grace-giving grace, not because he possesses it, but because he gives the immeasurable, incomprehensible light.

"How am I to speak with you about him? His aeon is indestructible, at rest and existing in silence, reposing (and) being prior to everything. For he is the head of all the aeons, and it is he who gives them strength in his goodness. For we know not the ineffable things, and we do not understand what is immeasurable, except for him who came forth from him, namely (from) the Father. For it is he who told it to us alone. For it is he who looks at himself in his light which surrounds him, namely the spring of the water of life. And it is he who gives to all the aeons and in every way, (and) who gazes upon his image which he sees in the spring of the Spirit. It is he who puts his desire in his water-light which is in the spring of the pure light-water which surrounds him."- Secret Book of John

The teaching matches what Jesus taught, over the orthodox view of God using the OT. It moves beyond the Biblical (physical) view of God. The view can only be an image in mind through spiritual (gnosis) rather than what the mind see's through eyes and ears.

My perception through seeking.
Not exactly. I have just never seen any evidence that convinces me that god(s) exist. (I am an atheist.)
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Why on earth should we take anything you say seriously when you lead off with something ridiculous that you just made up?

An Atheist "hopes" God doesn't exist.


He might be right if he said "An atheist hopes that an evil God doesn't exist". And since he believes in the God of the Bible, a clearly evil God, he assumes that since that is "God" that we hope "God" does not exist.

I will go out on a limb here and say that I do not believe in gods. That does not mean that I absolutely deny the existence of them. Find valid evidence and I will change my mind. But if there is a God I hope that it is not the evil God of the Christian Bible.
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
Please try to concentrate. The punishment for jaywalking should not be the same as the punishment for child rape. That is where Christianity fails.
You're correct. and it isn't. Man is on the path towards something that "God" is trying to save him from. It's merely an acceptance or not. The concept of what "hell" is, is a man made vision, not God made.

IMO.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
What Christ taught was based on faith and "hope". A Christian "hopes" in God. An Atheist "hopes" God doesn't exist. There is no knowing, only faith (in what we se

Wrong way round, an atheist see no evidence for a god a christian has faith (hope) that a god exists

See, the truth is in the fact that you take your faith on faith.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You're correct. and it isn't. Man is on the path towards something that "God" is trying to save him from. It's merely an acceptance or not. The concept of what "hell" is, is a man made vision, not God made.

IMO.
Yet according to the Bible the punishment is the same. In fact the only sin that is not forgivable is a rather minor one. But then Christians have to reinterpret the Bible since only a psychopath could follow the Bible literally, and I do not think that you are a psychopath.

Also a literal interpretation of the Bible leads one to conclude that the only thing that God is "saving" people from is himself.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
You're correct. and it isn't. Man is on the path towards something that "God" is trying to save him from. It's merely an acceptance or not. The concept of what "hell" is, is a man made vision, not God made.

IMO.

"Something" being of course, "god"itself.

What a psycho excuse for a "god".
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
"Something" being of course, "god"itself.

What a psycho excuse for a "god".


LOL! I just edited my post to include that little tidbit. Position-wise it looks like I beat you to the punch, but in reality your post beat my addition, but not by much.
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
Not exactly. I have just never seen any evidence that convinces me that god(s) exist. (I am an atheist.)
So what if God does exist even IF you don't see (know) him? Are you going to argue evidence when others saw him and you didn't? Faith is "hope" in things unseen (or unknown). I "hope" the car coming towards me on a two lane road doesn't hit me headon. My "faith" is that he won't. You just fail to see how faith and hope is used in the mind.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
So what if God does exist even IF you don't see (know) him? Are you going to argue evidence when others saw him and you didn't? Faith is "hope" in things unseen (or unknown). I "hope" the car coming towards me on a two lane road doesn't hit me headon. My "faith" is that he won't. You just fail to see how faith and hope is used in the mind.
Sorry, but that is an equivocation fallacy on your part. You are conflating hope and faith with conclusions based upon experience.

The fact that theists in general cannot consistently use the word "faith" indicates that they know their religious faith is without merit.
 
Top