• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"60 percent of heterosexual women are attracted to other women"

Skwim

Veteran Member



1357658814_7781_image.jpg

"A new study at the Boise State University says that heterosexual women are naturally bi-curious when it comes to their relationships with other women. But the report also says the feelings are completely normal and generally increase with age.

Researchers studies 484 heterosexual women. From that group, 60 percent said they were sexually attracted to other women; 45 percent had actually kissed a woman, and 50 percent of the women had fantasies about other women that involved some kind of sexual experience."
source
So, to all the women out there, do you find this to be reasonable? Not that you necessarily include yourself in the 60%, but that from what you know of other women it's reasonable. Personally, I'm quite surprised at the number, thinking it would be closer to 25% -33%.

I was unable to find any figures for men that addressed the same criteria, so I didn't bother to mention any that came close; however, if anyone knows of such figures please share.

What percentage of heterosexual men are attracted to other men?​


.


.
 
Last edited:

lovesong

:D
Premium Member
I would definitely be part of that 60% as I've had a few girl crushes, a number of sexual experiences with girls, and am always up to do it again. The only thing that would set me apart from someone who is bi is that I could never have a real relationship with a girl, the feelings just aren't the same. In any case, I'm honestly very surprised by their reported percent.
 

Subhankar Zac

Hare Krishna,Hare Krishna,
It's interesting that straight women have to bicurious but straight men can never have emotions for other men...
For men, it's either gay or straight. There's no middle ground, and though some straight men share their stories of experimenting with other men, society still sees that as gay.
Bottomline: Prejudice against a more flexible and open form of sexual curiosity for men is HIGHLY STIGMATIZED and even any positive research on that is stigmatized as false or hogwash but in a world run by straight men and for straight men, women are exactly what they imagine them to be.

If ever a study comes up showing that straight men have feelings for each other, probably that site will be burnt as it is an attempt to demean straight men as remotely gay.
Social stigma in the world where western and Islamic culture is taking root, sexual freedom for men is based in their respective dogma since most consider it as an achievement to sleep with multiple women and demerit if a man sleeps with a man.
 

Sand Dancer

Crazy Cat Lady
It's interesting that straight women have to bicurious but straight men can never have emotions for other men...
For men, it's either gay or straight. There's no middle ground, and though some straight men share their stories of experimenting with other men, society still sees that as gay.
Bottomline: Prejudice against a more flexible and open form of sexual curiosity for men is HIGHLY STIGMATIZED and even any positive research on that is stigmatized as false or hogwash but in a world run by straight men and for straight men, women are exactly what they imagine them to be.

If ever a study comes up showing that straight men have feelings for each other, probably that site will be burnt as it is an attempt to demean straight men as remotely gay.
Social stigma in the world where western and Islamic culture is taking root, sexual freedom for men is based in their respective dogma since most consider it as an achievement to sleep with multiple women and demerit if a man sleeps with a man.

Women's sexuality is more fluid than men's, but I think we knew that.
 

jeager106

Learning more about Jehovah.
Premium Member
?????????????????
I wish I had not seen this post.
I must admit that two men getting it on disgusts me.
Two women doing it is stimulating.
Am I weird?
No, I don't think so. I am male and I believe men think that way.
I have no idea why. It is what it is.
Oh, and as an aside I have seen a few porno flicks and they interest me not
in the least.
If I can't feel and touch I'm not stimulated.
I LIKE feeling and touching. Women that is.
 

Subhankar Zac

Hare Krishna,Hare Krishna,
?????????????????
I wish I had not seen this post.
I must admit that two men getting it on disgusts me.
Two women doing it is stimulating.
Am I weird?
No, I don't think so. I am male and I believe men think that way.
I have no idea why. It is what it is.
Oh, and as an aside I have seen a few porno flicks and they interest me not
in the least.
If I can't feel and touch I'm not stimulated.
I LIKE feeling and touching. Women that is.


Thank you for telling us how two men doing it disgusts you... As in you could puke if you see two men doing it.
Would you like to tell us in detail of what's the color of your puke as well?
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
I don't see a problem with that. We all have our moments from time to time.

Thank you for telling us how two men doing it disgusts you... As in you could puke if you see two men doing it.
Would you like to tell us in detail of what's the color of your puke as well?

Easy there, bro :p
 

Subhankar Zac

Hare Krishna,Hare Krishna,
I don't see a problem with that. We all have our moments from time to time.



Easy there, bro :p


Not really. Most men, despite having moments have to hide it for the stigma attached with the dogma of masculinity.
While for women it's exactly the opposite way.
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
Not really. Most men, despite having moments have to hide it for the stigma attached with the dogma of masculinity.
While for women it's exactly the opposite way.

Just to be sure; my comment to your post was "Easy there, bro" only. The rest; i.e. "I don't see a problem with that. We all have our moments from time to time:, was to the OP :)
 

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
I am not sure where the "60%" tally comes from, I mean why not 59% or 62.5%, if you know what I mean. I wonder how someone even came up with such a tally, and I know it is common to say all people are just the same when you get right down to it, but having had the opportunity to travel a lot to areas of the world - actually my observation is while you might have a collective here that are commonly the same, another collective over there are not the same.

And I think things change over time and I am not talking about just changing opinions or political party or such abstracts. Even at the physical level things change and it seems to mean much faster than imagined, even in a short span of 100 years in some cases.

Take this 60 percent guesswork. Maybe it is 60 percent today at a very real "biological" or "physical" level... but 100 years ago humans were physically wired in a different way such that perhaps 100 years ago it was only 42% and not 60%.

And 100 years from now it might reverse direction and only 7% are like that.

Personally, I see a future, far into the future, when we are all asexual - that is not interested in sex, and we are neither a man nor a woman. We are advanced angelic like beings neither men nor women and we do not have sex anymore. We can make "more uf us" simply by mass consciousness or perhaps mind melding or something. Men's organs will evolve into a skin flap and eventually fall off completely like some beings lose their monkey tails, women just "close up" and basically look like a Barbie doll down there when you pull Barbie's pants down - nothing there but one front side of the moon.

We won't be eating meat or even much of anything by then, in my "opinion".

But until then, it is what it is - but not for very long. Actually, I think this 60 percent is over exaggeration. And it will actually be things such as Pokemon Go that will excellerate this "sexless" cloning of a "new human" all the while also killing off humans who will not reproduce because they crashed their car or walked off the cliff while playing Pokemon Go, those who should not reproduce will be killed off with things like Pokemon Go, the others who are not carry us to the future, this is just one example and could include the effect of constantly burning the back of your eyes with a flashlight beaming into them from computer monitors, big tv's, games and so on, which I think could burn other things into your vision. I hear some say that people are more "sexed" and sex crazy today than in, oh the 1950s or 60s. But actually I think men and girls were much more sex machines back in the 60s than many of the dumpy people today, I mean just because there are more adverts and open displays of sex today doesn't mean people are more sex machines today than yesterday. In fact, I think the opposite - they not only are less so, many do not even know how. Dumpy people.

But in one way, the fact that actually less people are sex machines today than the past might only argue my prediction that we are evolving into asexual beings who are neither male nor female, but rather becoming slowly but surely advanced eunuchs or something - and for example, when we see Hindu priests or some brahmacharis with bald shaved heads, this is simply a vision into the future when we will be totally hairless. In fact hair will be a sign of backward genes or something.

We will all be hairless eunuchs. But ... male pattern baldness is NOT a sign of advanced future beingfull genes. But hairy backs ARE a sign that you still have a long way to go. For example, I am 60 and I have a full set of hair on my head. But not on my back. But I have noticed SOME men are clearly, well, neanderthalic and baldy but hairy backs. So when we all do go bald for positive reasons, men and women, it will be very fast and essentially we will suddenly have babies who NEVER grow hair on their head - just born bald from day one.

Then we will be far on our way to becoming super advanced sexless beings. Angelic in some ways.

And... we will be shades of pastels. Some will be shining electric blue, some green, yellow, lapis, with halos.

But I could be wrong. But usually I am right.
 
Last edited:

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
I think that many men are also attracted to other men, but of course that's not allowed, and hence we have so many men who are violent towards each other, all trying to be the stallion that they ain't.

Exactly so, and of course the worst homophobes are closet gays or bisexuals, terrified of the ambiguities in their own sexuality.
 
Last edited:

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
That's not necessarily true. The social stigma is just much more high for men in this area, and so there's much higher amount of dishonesty and denial among men.

Very true, there is a big social pressure on men to be "manly" and not to be "effeminate".

Despite that all kinds of stuff goes on in male-only environments like prisons and the military. But it's always "Don't ask, don't tell". ;)
 
Top