metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
I frankly have more respect for those who just admit their dislike of religion and become disbelievers (at least they're honest) than the pretence that is liberal religion. We can discus the nuances of Scripture, but there's no getting around the sinfulness of homosexual acts.
"Liberal religion" is not a "pretense" for those who believe that the scriptures have much or maybe even more of a human authorship than a divine one, and I don't really see any dishonesty with those who may believe that way.
House values are more based on what real estate agents often say "location, location, location", and theologians more use "interpretation, interpretation, interpretation", and part of this "interpretation" deals with the question of inerrancy especially.
To put it in another way, is the reference to homosexual acts being a sin a reflection of what God teaches or what humans back then believed? There really in no way to tell for sure, so it boils down to what one may believe, but beliefs do vary.