• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

When Should Women Obey Their Husbands?

Unification

Well-Known Member
Eexcuuuuse me! If you don't care what the Bible says, fine. However, if you do care then you can't dismiss what god said by pretending it doesn't exist. God said:

1 Peter 3
3 Wives, respect and obey your husbands in the same way.

Ephesians 5:22-33
22 A wife should put her husband first, as she does the Lord. 23 A husband is the head of his wife,

Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.
And, there are are no exceptions mentioned are there? Nope. So you can't go around making them up.

Eexcuuuuse me! If you don't care what the Bible says, fine. However, if you do care then you can't dismiss what god said by pretending it doesn't exist. God said:

1 Peter 3
3 Wives, respect and obey your husbands in the same way.

Ephesians 5:22-33
22 A wife should put her husband first, as she does the Lord. 23 A husband is the head of his wife,

Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.
And, there are are no exceptions mentioned are there? Nope. So you can't go around making them up.

Saddening.
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Eexcuuuuse me! If you don't care what the Bible says, fine. However, if you do care then you can't dismiss what god said by pretending it doesn't exist. God said:

1 Peter 3
3 Wives, respect and obey your husbands in the same way.

Ephesians 5:22-33
22 A wife should put her husband first, as she does the Lord. 23 A husband is the head of his wife,

Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.
And, there are are no exceptions mentioned are there? Nope. So you can't go around making them up.
God said? Do you know what agnostic means?
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
When will people learn to say "it is written" or "God's Word says" and not "God says". I think the only thing that God ever said was "this is my son, the beloved, listen to him" and some thunder.

Did Jesus ever say "God says"?
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
God said? Do you know what agnostic means?
Yup. Ever hear of a devils advocate?

When will people learn to say "it is written" or "God's Word says" and not "God says."
Because they don't mean to say "it is written" or "God's Word says," but "God says." I know it may be disturbing that not everyone agrees with your reading of the Bible, but that's life.
shrug_n.gif



Did Jesus ever say "God says"?
Don't really know. Is it important?
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Yup. Ever hear of a devils advocate?
Interesting word choice.

Because they don't mean to say "it is written" or "God's Word says," but "God says."
Like maybe they are in the presence of God? I do not believe it.
I know it may be disturbing
Disturbing? No. But stupid? Yes.
]not everyone agrees with your reading of the Bible, but that's life.
Nobody agrees with my reading of the Bible.
Don't really know. Is it important?
I think if "God's Word" never says "God says" it's important. Where did they learn it? Not from God's Word. And according to them there is just one other source and we KNOW what God's Word says about it.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Interesting word choice.
Actually it comes from the Latin advocatus diaboli. You do recognize it as an age-old concept don't you?

"The background of this word comes from an official position within the Catholic Church, in which a canon lawyer called the Devil's Advocate, also known as the Promoter of Faith, "argued against the canonization (sainthood) of a candidate in order to uncover any character flaws or misrepresentation evidence favoring canonization."
(source: Wikipedia)
 

Robert.Evans

You will be assimilated; it is His Will.
And that is your SPECULATION, - it does not say that in the Bible.
It says it in mine. Anyway, so what?Anyone wishing to learn anything has to do a certain amount of leg work.
The Bible specifically tells us Adam and Chav'vah were the first,
No it does not say that they were the ''first''.
- their child produces the first earth children, and genealogies.
But you would have to understand who and what the Adam and Chavvah are in the first place to coimment on such things.
Then the Ark story says the flood was over the tops of the mountains, thus earth wide. It tells us whom survived, and their genealogies.
Agian, not in mine it doesn't, and again, one has to look deeper. It is written that way because it shows higher things which are intuitively known.
It very obviously means a whole-earth flood, and it is bull.
As the divine word is reflective and fractal in action, you will see that the earth was covered in its early development with water, as indeed it was 'snowball earth'.
The diversity of people and animals could not have happened in that time.
It is not saying that as I have already told you. It is speaking of a people on a land a few thousand years ago.
So no, - your speculation on "only spiritual," in what "some" of the Bible says, does not answer the question.
It does.
Obviously it is myth, however - most of Christianity pushes it as truth, - which we must accept, - or go to Hell.
Myth can also mean an ancient story. If you mean from that point of view, then fine. If you are saying that it is not right, then you need more than what you have just given. You are speaking now of Scripture. Scripture is not read in the normal fashion, which I think is your mistake.
So, it is either truth - as the religions of Abraham teach, - and thus can't be fooled with.
Fooled from its original state if one wants the original meaning. But the Spirit is living and active now, and God is an evolving consciousness, which also has to be understood.
Or it is MYTH, - like all other religions, - meaning NONE have to follow it, - and Christianity needs to stop telling people they are going to hell for not following the laws, or for not accepting what they know is just MYTH.
They don't ''know'' it is just myth; and all of us to one degree or another will go into the fires that cleanse. To burn something is to burn off what is not correct.
In other words - the rather convenient switching back and forth between some parts being myth, and other parts that are equally fantastic/mythical
That is spiritual discernment and it might be different for each one as we all have our own reality which we all in turn answer for.
(virgin birth, no male father other than YHVH,
The virgin birth is speaking of something higher, as all things are, such as the flood.
trinity God, Jesus appearing after death, etc.,) as being truth, and thus we MUST believe and follow the religion, shows a tendency for such believers, and teachers, to be hypocrites.

*
I don't see why you think they are hypocrites... don't see the link. You atheist views are your own, and you, as I, will answer for every action and every word. That is the way it is. But you must not mistake reading the bible as being something anyone can do. It is hard enough for those who know, let alone those who don't. ;)
 

Robert.Evans

You will be assimilated; it is His Will.
Eexcuuuuse me! If you don't care what the Bible says, fine. However, if you do care then you can't dismiss what god said by pretending it doesn't exist. God said:

1 Peter 3
3 Wives, respect and obey your husbands in the same way.

Ephesians 5:22-33
22 A wife should put her husband first, as she does the Lord. 23 A husband is the head of his wife,

Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.
And, there are are no exceptions mentioned are there? Nope. So you can't go around making them up.
Not quite as simple as that as they are not called commandments.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Not quite as simple as that as they are not called commandments.
Why does it make a difference if they're called commandments or not? Are the only pronouncements in the Bible worth heeding those that are called commandments?
 
Last edited:

Robert.Evans

You will be assimilated; it is His Will.
Why does it make a difference if they're called commandments or not? Are the only pronouncements in the Bible worth heeding those that are called commandments?
Oh I don't say we don't take heed of them, but I am just saying it is not that simple. An umbrella one day might be a good idea, but the next, a bad idea. But it is with what spirit we take it in that counts. If we take it to the letter of the written word, we are restricted, as all things cannot be covered in a book. Also the written word can be ambiguous. The Spirit is the one that guides us through this.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
But it is with what spirit we take it in that counts. If we take it to the letter of the written word, we are restricted, as all things cannot be covered in a book.
Except for those regarded as commandments I presume.

Also the written word can be ambiguous. The Spirit is the one that guides us through this.
And you think everyone deserving of guidance is guided the same? The thousands of Christian denominations argues against such a thing. Of course, I imagine that every guided soul, like yourself, is sure that they're being guided correctly, unlike the poor soul next door who has been led astray. Makes one wonder why god would have done such a thing, sent a message that he knew would be so misconstrued as to lead people down the wrong path; leaving only a chosen few, very few, such as yourself on the right path. Gotta wonder, don't ya, why you, out of thousands of other Christ seeking Christians, were shown the way while the others have been sent on a wild goose chase.
 
Last edited:

Robert.Evans

You will be assimilated; it is His Will.
Except for those regarded as commandments I presume.

And you think everyone deserving of guidance is guided the same? The thousands of Christian denominations argues against such a thing. Of course, I imagine that every guided soul, like yourself, is sure that they're being guided correctly, unlike the poor soul next door has been led astray. Makes one wonder why god would have done such a thing, sent a message that he knew would be so misconstrued as to lead people down the wrong path; leaving only a chosen few, very few, such as yourself on the right path. Gotta wonder, don't ya, why you, out of thousands of other Christ seeking Christians, were shown the way while the others have been sent on a wild goose chase.
Haha.... yeah it seems strange at first I must agree. But when you realise there are many different realities, then it is not a problem. Not that you're probably interested, but I remember seeing an old woman at a group meeting I went to a few years ago. As I knew she would not believe everything I would have, I wondered how it is that she still could not be saved. After all, it was evening, and of all the people there with a good excuse to stop at home, surely it was her. It troubled me greatly at the time. She did after all believe.

Well the answer is long and boring, but there are many different levels of reality, and we are all on a journey to get through them. Her reality was not mine, but she will be saved as I, as any will that believe. God acts in a reflective way you see; thus there is, in simple terms, many Gods, (though in reality there is only One).
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
A good wife knows that to make her husband happy means to be submissive and obedient to him. Obedience in terms of marriage should be unconditional since it allows for the male to pursue a life outside of the home with no stress
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
A good wife knows that to make her husband happy means to be submissive and obedient to him. Obedience in terms of marriage should be unconditional since it allows for the male to pursue a life outside of the home with no stress

Are you trolling?

A good dog obeys the owner. Are we comparing wives to dogs, and husbands to owners now?
 

Ingledsva

HEATHEN ALASKAN
It says it in mine. Anyway, so what?Anyone wishing to learn anything has to do a certain amount of leg work.

No it does not say that they were the ''first''.

But you would have to understand who and what the Adam and Chavvah are in the first place to coimment on such things.

Agian, not in mine it doesn't, and again, one has to look deeper. It is written that way because it shows higher things which are intuitively known.

As the divine word is reflective and fractal in action, you will see that the earth was covered in its early development with water, as indeed it was 'snowball earth'.

It is not saying that as I have already told you. It is speaking of a people on a land a few thousand years ago.

It does.

Myth can also mean an ancient story. If you mean from that point of view, then fine. If you are saying that it is not right, then you need more than what you have just given. You are speaking now of Scripture. Scripture is not read in the normal fashion, which I think is your mistake.

Fooled from its original state if one wants the original meaning. But the Spirit is living and active now, and God is an evolving consciousness, which also has to be understood.

They don't ''know'' it is just myth; and all of us to one degree or another will go into the fires that cleanse. To burn something is to burn off what is not correct.

That is spiritual discernment and it might be different for each one as we all have our own reality which we all in turn answer for.

The virgin birth is speaking of something higher, as all things are, such as the flood.

I don't see why you think they are hypocrites... don't see the link. You atheist views are your own, and you, as I, will answer for every action and every word. That is the way it is. But you must not mistake reading the bible as being something anyone can do. It is hard enough for those who know, let alone those who don't. ;)

And EVERYTHING you have said here concerning these stories is SPECULATION on your part.

The Bible does not say what you are alluding to.

So stop trying to put it in that - this is the way it is - you just don't understand - CRAP!

*


*
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
Are you trolling?

A good dog obeys the owner. Are we comparing wives to dogs, and husbands to owners now?

Traditionally a husband was a owner and for the most part should remain one. The wife is indeed property of the husband and this is a traditional value which should be acknowledged. It is of the duty of the husband to protect the wife along with everything he owns
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
what did you say? I was busy making u a sammich!
:rolleyes:

You better put pickles in that thing! And hold the grass!

. . . for real though when my parents worked in a restaurant a customer told em to "put none of dat pale grass on my hamburger." Like WTF! o_O
 
Top