That's not how rationality works. It doesn't change from person to person. It isn't "hey, it makes sense to me!" To be rational, you must conform to the laws of logic, you must employ critical thinking and skepticism. What you're really doing is engaging in word games. You don't want to be seen as irrational so you're just changing the definition of the word and laying claim to it.
Rationality is based on facts. What you and I accept as fact maybe different. I can't force you to accept something as fact regardless of how firmly I belief it is a fact. And vice versa, therefore what we accept as rational may not be the same.
None of which makes it rational. You had an experience, you defined the experience the way you wanted it defined. You did not test your premises, nor your conclusions, to see if they were the most reasonable explanation for whatever happened to you.
All based on what I have decided were the facts of my experiences.
Or simply leave it at "I don't know" and stop trying to attach further significance to it.
But that is what humans do. That is all we do. Attach significance to our experiences. I see this and understand this and realize how arbitrary it all is. Man creates the knowledge, defines the knowledge and determines what the facts are. We did this with God and now do the same with objective reality.
But that's the problem, you should be. Everyone should be. Reality matters.
You decide what matters. you can decide it for yourself. You can't decide it for me.
No, you accept what you experience as an initial starting place, then you go on to test your experiences and evaluate them rationally. If someone who was color blind simply accepted their senses, they'd come to the conclusion that there was no color in the world and they would be incorrect. It is only through further evaluation that we can come closer to the truth.
Lets say there is a God sense. You don't have it, someone else does. For example Christians claim the Holy Spirit is their God sense. Someone with out this sense would conclude there is no God and they would be incorrect. It is only through further evaluation we can come closer to the truth.
But your personal view really doesn't matter to anyone but you. There is a larger objective reality out there, what actually exists beyond our beliefs and desires and dreams, it's what continues to exist once we stop applying our beliefs to it. That's what really makes a difference because it's the reality in which we all actually live. Can the Christian God exist? Sure. Is it likely? No. Can the Hindu gods exist? Sure. Is it likely? No. How any of it makes you feel is entirely irrelevant to whether it's actually so. People need to be more concerned with what actually is and less with what they wish was. It doesn't actually get them anywhere.
We are not capable of observing objective reality, we can't experience it. There exists no objective proof for it. Yet you insist it exists. The only thing we know is subjective reality based on our own experiences.