• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Best Conceal Carry Weapon- Revolver or Automatic?

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I didn't know that the Glock misstep of putting a safety on a trigger was called a "New York trigger" you learn something everyday.
Nah....the trigger safety is on all the triggers, & is no "misstep".
Note that S&W copied it with their own variant on their Sigma series.
The "New York" trigger just has a heavier pull.

In the end I trust steel and wood over plastic but that is just me
Plastic is a better engineering material for some applications. In the case of Glock, it offers more capacity in a
smaller package at a lower weight & with better recoil attenuation than a traditional steel frame with wood grips.
Tis fine to prefer old school designs, but I wouldn't call'm better.
 
Last edited:
That's what my baby mama carries. I prefer a "real man's" machine gun:
lw50-1.jpg


If you aren't shooting .50 cal., you're not shooting.

And when you just really need to "reach out and touch someone":

steyr_amr_1.jpg


The cartridge the rifle above fires compared to your standard puny 7.62 NATO round:
steyr_amm.jpg

What a fool
 
Plastic is a better engineering material for some applications. In the case of Glock, it offers more capacity in a
smaller package at a lower weight & with better recoil attenuation than a traditional steel frame with wood grips.
Tis fine to prefer old school designs, but I wouldn't call'm better.

Again, how many people do you need to shoot? As far as the weight you are saving nothing more than a few ounces so this is not a consideration to me and if you keep the weapon close to your body there is little to no concern for recoil for most personal crimes happen within 5' but to each their own
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Again, how many people do you need to shoot?
I could'a sworn I already answered that one.
Here's a new answer.
I don't know until an unfortunate incident presents itself.
But it costs nothing to prepare for worse than expected.

As far as the weight you are saving nothing more than a few ounces so this is not a consideration to me and if you keep the weapon close to your body there is little to no concern for recoil for most personal crimes happen within 5' but to each their own
Well, I carry all day every day.
A little weight & size savings helps me.
As a former competitive target shooter, I say that recoil is a consideration, especially with handguns.
The reasons are several: legal liability related to caliber, accuracy, joint damage from practice, capacity related to caliber, practice cost related to caliber, grip size related to caliber, weight
For newbies, recoil is a very important matter. The flinch reflex is easy to acquire & tough to rid.
 
Last edited:

Trey of Diamonds

Well-Known Member
I could'a sworn I already answered that one.
Here's a new answer.
I don't know until an unfortunate incident presents itself.
But it costs nothing to prepare for worse than expected.

Well, I carry all day every day.
A little weight & size savings helps me.
As a former competitive target shooter, I say that recoil is a consideration, especially with handguns.
The reasons are several: legal liability related to caliber, accuracy, joint damage from practice, capacity related to caliber, practice cost related to caliber

I don't carry but I did shoot competitively for a few years. I wouldn't carry my competition pistol as a concealed weapon, its hard to conceal a 357 with a 6 inch barrel. The 357 is a great weapon for competition due to its heavy frame. When you fire 38 match loads out of a 357 the recoil is almost nothing and reacquiring the target is easy in the speed rounds.

But for concealed carry I would most likely look for a small 38 revolver with a shrouded hammer. Quick, easy to draw and fire and it uses the same ammo as my competition pistol.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
So in other words you are talking out of your A S S
"Well, I carry all day every day a little weight & size savings helps me"
Sounds like BS to me:yes:
Oh, dear....there are some opinions of each other which shouldn't be shared during civil discourse.
I give you that courtesy, & I expect the same in return. When your equanimity returns, we'll talk.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I don't carry but I did shoot competitively for a few years. I wouldn't carry my competition pistol as a concealed weapon, its hard to conceal a 357 with a 6 inch barrel. The 357 is a great weapon for competition due to its heavy frame. When you fire 38 match loads out of a 357 the recoil is almost nothing and reacquiring the target is easy in the speed rounds.

But for concealed carry I would most likely look for a small 38 revolver with a shrouded hammer. Quick, easy to draw and fire and it uses the same ammo as my competition pistol.
True all dat.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
When I think "personal defense" I think close range, chaos, maybe panic. I'd look for something small, easily concealed and quickly deployed; something you could point in the general direction of an assailant and still have some hope of hitting him.
I'd consider a 45/.410 derringer with BB to #4 size shotshells, or maybe those Winchester PDX rounds with 3 stacked disks+12 BB shot.

Oh, and everyone knows Taurus is junk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Trey of Diamonds

Well-Known Member
Don't you guys feel naked when you come to Europe.

Or does it put you off that only criminals carry guns here.

Doesn't bother me a bit. I don't carry guns I just play with them on occasion. In enjoyed hunting when I was a kid and shooting competitively but I haven't been an active shooter since my daughter was born nearly 10 years ago. Its more fun to play with her. Of course in a few years we'll be dusting the ole guns off and teaching her how to use them safely and effectively but I'm not in a hurry.
 
Top