Whathell
Member
Pssssss ...we're not suppose to think or ask this!
Just wait until or discuss information after the Bang ...then cause and effect are somewhat more logical to give answers and model ...lol
But seriously, it's the truth!
You will be argued-down and hear statements being made like "...no evidence ...no God" but if you point to the logical fallacy of a bang occurring from initially nothing and countering with "...no evidence ...no Bang" you get all kinds of unfair remarks.
With much arrogance, some actually think in the extremely brief time-line of human existence, in comparison to the universe's, that we have knowledge of what's going on. I find that absolutely hilarious and at the same time it shows how desperate mankind is to do what they wish and excuse any responsibility to a higher power.
Truthfully/Logically, concerning what's in existence, is there any difference in one stating:
1. In the beginning ...God
vs.
2. In the beginning ...Bang
...hmmm?
Let's discuss
Just wait until or discuss information after the Bang ...then cause and effect are somewhat more logical to give answers and model ...lol
But seriously, it's the truth!
You will be argued-down and hear statements being made like "...no evidence ...no God" but if you point to the logical fallacy of a bang occurring from initially nothing and countering with "...no evidence ...no Bang" you get all kinds of unfair remarks.
With much arrogance, some actually think in the extremely brief time-line of human existence, in comparison to the universe's, that we have knowledge of what's going on. I find that absolutely hilarious and at the same time it shows how desperate mankind is to do what they wish and excuse any responsibility to a higher power.
Truthfully/Logically, concerning what's in existence, is there any difference in one stating:
1. In the beginning ...God
vs.
2. In the beginning ...Bang
...hmmm?
Let's discuss