paarsurrey
Veteran Member
I don't get you please.
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't get you please.
It is funny how paarsurrey have snipped out part of wiki article of Islam in Bosnia-Herzegovina about the conquest of the land, capturing Bosnia and Herzegovina before the Slavs had converted. The Slavic Muslims only joined Islam after the invasion. The conversion to Islam may have been freely converted, but it did not happen until after the invasion, not before the invasion.[quote mining intensifies]
I don't see any sword in spread of Islam in Bosnia Herzegovina . Do you see any?
Please correct me if I am wrong.
We know that the Bosnian Serbs murdered the Bosnian Muslims in the Bosnian War. No one is denying that horrible genocide.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_Genocide
One could see that sword had been used against Muslims, while more that 8000 Muslims were killed, how many Muslims did convert to the religion of killers?
Islam in Bosnia and Herzegovina said:Islam was first brought to the Balkans by the Ottomans in the mid-to-late 15th century who gained control of most of Bosnia in 1463, and seized Herzegovina in the 1480s. Over the next century, the Bosnians - composed of dualists and Slavic tribes living in the Bosnian kingdom under the name of Bošnjani [5] - embraced Islam in great numbers under Ottoman rule which also saw the name Bošnjanin transform into Bošnjak ('Bosniak'). By the early 1600s, approximately two thirds of the population of Bosnia were Muslim.[6] Bosnia and Herzegovina remained a province in the Ottoman Empire and gained autonomy after the Bosnian uprising in 1831. After the 1878 Congress of Berlin it came under the temporary control of Austria-Hungary. In 1908, Austria-Hungary formally annexed the region.
Bosnia, along with Albania, were the only parts of the Ottoman Empire in the Balkans where large numbers of people were converted to Islam, and remained there after independence. In other areas of the former Ottoman Empire where Muslims formed the majority or started to form the majority, those Muslims were either expelled, assimilated/Christianized, massacred, or fled elsewhere (Muhajirs).
The problem with using any country that was part of the Ottoman Empire is that the Ottomans DID forcibly convert LOTS of people. The Muslim Empires in general did not use forced conversion, but the Ottomans actually did.
You should probably steer clear of any Christian country conquered by the Ottomans on this topic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devşirme
"Devşirme[a] (literally "collecting" in Turkish), also known as the blood tax or tribute in blood, was chiefly the annual practice by which the Ottoman Empire sent military to abduct boys, sons of their Christian subjects in the villages of the Balkans and Anatolia.[1] They were then converted to Islam[2]with the primary objective of selecting and training the ablest children for the military or civil service of the Empire, notably into the Janissaries.[3]"
As borders of the Ottoman Empire expanded, the devşirme was extended to include Bulgarians, Croats, Serbs, Armeniansand later, in rare instances, Romanians, Georgians, Poles, Ukrainians and southern Russians. The Janissaries first began enrolling outside the devşirme (known as blood tax) system during the reign of Sultan Murad III (1574–1595).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janissaries
It happened accidentally, on your pointing it out, I made the amends post #2563. Even if I have missed something now, I will publish that portion now. Sorry.But you posted a link from the Wiki article - Islam in Bosnia and Herzegovina - in post #2543, but you didn't copy the whole content:
You didn't copy the part under the title The Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian era
Islam has been reformed under the Ahmadiyya
Don't worry about them. Just stick to the Truth.Nice claim you got there. Too bad that Sunni and Shia disagree.
I respect that the Ahmadiyya are more peaceful than some other sects, but the only reform made by the Ahmadiyya is only accepted by the Ahmadis.Islam has been reformed under the Ahmadiyya and is one of the fastest spreading religious community in the world.
We are neither here to impress one another, nor to convert one, we could just help one another to find the Truth. Ant Truth starts with One person and then others join in to sing the song of Truth. Truth cannot be judged in terms of minority or majority. Will one kindly understand the point? PleaseI respect that the Ahmadiyya are more peaceful than some other sects, but the only reform made by the Ahmadiyya is only accepted by the Ahmadis.
Sure, you may think the Ahmadiyya is the faster growing sect, but the number of Ahmadis is still less than 1% of Muslim world population. Compare that with at least 87% (some would estimate it be 90%) are Sunni Muslims, and 13% are Shiites (or 10%), then Ahmadis is just a small fraction.
That being the case, where there only a fraction in numbers of Ahmadis, then this "reform" you would call it, is only being accepted by that fraction of one percent of Muslims...which make it not a reform at all.
I don't know about the Shia, but the majority Sunni either see your sect as not Muslims at all, or at best a heretic sect.
The problem is with Mirza Ghulum Ahmad himself. Ahmad self-proclaim of being a Mahdi and the second Messiah. Other than Ahmadis, no other Muslims accept him as such.
So "fast spreading" or not, the Ahmadis or Ahmadiyya still don't make up a whole ONE percent.
Don't get me wrong, paarsurrey, I don't hate Ahmadiyya or the Ahmadis. I am just not impressed.
Friend! You write too short. Right?People who go on about how they are "follow/are/know the truth" usually are as far away from it as possible.
then stop ignoring the truthWe are neither here to impress one another, nor to convert one, we could just help one another to find the Truth. Ant Truth starts with One person and then others join in to sing the song of Truth. Truth cannot be judged in terms of minority or majority. Will one kindly understand the point? Please
Regards
It is equally valid for everybody. Right? Pleasethen stop ignoring the truth
yes, but don't use that cop out to continue ignoring truths you dislike.It is equally valid for everybody. Right? Please
Regards