I'm bored and I just want to get to the meat of this. For the purpose of this discussion, race will be defined as biological variation between human groups or within the human species that can be quantified genetically, medically and/or anthropologically. Similar concepts are - for example - ethnicity, population, cline, haplogroup, etc.
This has nothing to do with notions of superiority or inferiority as those are subjective, i.e. one group may be considered generally superior to one person or in one area of inquiry and that same group may be considered generally inferior to another person or in another area of inquiry.So that's a waste of time so let's not get into it.
Also, use scientific data from the physical sciences where appropriate, such as physical/biological anthropology, biology, zoology, population genetics, medicine, etc. I don't want to see people using, for example, psychologists to buttress their argument! So people like Rushton, MacDonald and Murray are inappropriate to this debate.
![Smile :) :)]()
And..begin.
This has nothing to do with notions of superiority or inferiority as those are subjective, i.e. one group may be considered generally superior to one person or in one area of inquiry and that same group may be considered generally inferior to another person or in another area of inquiry.So that's a waste of time so let's not get into it.
Also, use scientific data from the physical sciences where appropriate, such as physical/biological anthropology, biology, zoology, population genetics, medicine, etc. I don't want to see people using, for example, psychologists to buttress their argument! So people like Rushton, MacDonald and Murray are inappropriate to this debate.
And..begin.
Last edited: