• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Attacks On Israel Broaden Beyond Hamas

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
As expected, Israel's brutality towards Palestinians
escalating to the level of genocide has inspired other
groups to attack Israel. Even if it were possible to
exterminate Hamas, Israel continues conducting
itself in the manner that created Hamas in the 1st
place.
So even before Hamas is gone, the Houthis
appear to have joined the fray.

Consider also that a vacuum created by Hamas's
extermination would be filled by Hezbollah,
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigades,
& The Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
As expected, Israel's brutality towards Palestinians
escalating to the level of genocide has inspired other
groups to attack Israel. Even if it were possible to
exterminate Hamas, Israel continues conducting
itself in the manner that created Hamas in the 1st
place.
So even before Hamas is gone, the Houthis
appear to have joined the fray.

Consider also that a vacuum created by Hamas's
extermination would be filled by Hezbollah,
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigades,
& The Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine.
Well......yes.
Netanyahou and the IDF seem to be determined to damage Israel's image and anything left of its reputation ........completely.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well......yes.
Netanyahou and the IDF seem to be determined to damage Israel's image and anything left of its reputation ........completely.
That's an interesting way to phrase things, ie,
addressing Israel's image & reputation. While
I see Israel creating greatly increased enmity.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Consider also that a vacuum created by Hamas's
extermination would be filled by Hezbollah,
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigades,
& The Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine.

Is Hamas significantly different than any of those?
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
I notice that Russia's getting hammered, too. I always did say that Russia was actually part of the West. It wants so much to be European, but its Western.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
I don't know.
But they're all significantly similar
in being enemies of Israel....which
is the point.

Islamists perceive many enemies, and bloody Islamic conquests are currently underway in many parts of the world.

I think perhaps THAT is the point.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
It is a pity that the UN is toothless. They could make a decision and enforce it. But no one wants the UN to take the risk of having the UN telling them what to do.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
As expected, Israel's brutality towards Palestinians
escalating to the level of genocide has inspired other
groups to attack Israel. Even if it were possible to
exterminate Hamas, Israel continues conducting
itself in the manner that created Hamas in the 1st
place.
So even before Hamas is gone, the Houthis
appear to have joined the fray.

Consider also that a vacuum created by Hamas's
extermination would be filled by Hezbollah,
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigades,
& The Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine.
Yes. I'm sure the gas chambers and the concentration camps are in full swing now.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Islamists perceive many enemies, and bloody Islamic conquests are currently underway in many parts of the world.

I think perhaps THAT is the point.
From your posts, especially this one, I discern
that you blame Islam itself for every conflict.
And that you ignore the possibility that some
Muslims would be peaceful were it not for
provocation, ie, Israel imposing apartheid,
poverty, starvation, & genocide upon them.
That is dangerous.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
As expected, Israel's brutality towards Palestinians
escalating to the level of genocide has inspired other
groups to attack Israel. Even if it were possible to
exterminate Hamas, Israel continues conducting
itself in the manner that created Hamas in the 1st
place.
So even before Hamas is gone, the Houthis
appear to have joined the fray.

Consider also that a vacuum created by Hamas's
extermination would be filled by Hezbollah,
Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigades,
& The Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine.

Are you saying new antisemitism is the fault of the government of Israel? :eek:
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Yes. I'm sure the gas chambers and the concentration camps are in full swing now.
Israel's style of genocide does indeed embody the
spirit of Nazi Germany, ie, demonize, dehumanize,
& deprive of existence. But Israel's style is more
palatable to western allies. It kills with less intention
towards particular individuals. Instead it has the
death at a distance method. An impersonal bomb
does the killing. So they can pretend their hands
are clean.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Are you saying new antisemitism is the fault of the government of Israel? :eek:
Israel is culpable for violent resistance to its history
of oppression, apartheid, thievery, & other human
rights abuses against Muslims / Palestinians.

It is false to dismiss Israel's foes as anti-Semites,
ie, that it's solely religious bigotry against Jews.
This ignores their fighting Israel because of the
evil it has perpetrated for over half a century.
An evil supported by USA & others.
 
Last edited:

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
From your posts, especially this one, I discern
that you blame Islam itself for every conflict.
And that you ignore the possibility that some
Muslims would be peaceful were it not for
provocation, ie, Israel imposing apartheid,
poverty, starvation, & genocide upon them.
That is dangerous.
I blame Islamists when they're the aggressors, which all over the world, is often.

I agree that some Muslims are peaceful, but they all follow a faith - by their own choice - that is not fundamentally peaceful.

As for your thoughts on provocation and your thoughts on Israel, I disagree and I don't either of us will change the other's mind on this point.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I blame Islamists when they're the aggressors, which all over the world, is often.
Even in Israel & its controlled territory?
As for your thoughts on provocation and your thoughts on Israel, I disagree and I don't either of us will change the other's mind on this point.
I never expected to.
I'm a heathen. No group is inherently
superior & or more entitled than any other.
Religion, gender, trans/cis, sex, politics.
All equally human.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Even in Israel & its controlled territory?
I'm curious to know what path you think Israel should follow?

I'm a heathen. No group is inherently
superior & or more entitled than any other.
Religion, gender, trans/cis, sex, politics.
All equally human.

That sounds to me like moral relativism, is that your stance?

I think that ultimately we can have objective morals - never perfect - but mostly workable.

For example, I think misogyny, homophobia, antisemitism, and theocracy are less entitled than their counterparts.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm curious to know what path you think Israel should follow?
End genocide.
End apartheid.
End imprisonment without trial.
Truth & reconciliation process.
Reparations.
That sounds to me like moral relativism, is that your stance?
I'm a moral relativist, so of course.
There is no absolute universally true morality.
No supreme being speaketh it unto us.
I think that ultimately we can have objective morals - never perfect - but mostly workable.
Objective morality is an illusion.
Otherwise we'd have universally
agreed upon premises.
For example, I think misogyny, homophobia, antisemitism, and theocracy are less entitled than their counterparts.
I oppose those things.
It's my opinion.
But they're being wrongful isn't not factual.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
End genocide.
End apartheid.
End imprisonment without trial.
Truth & reconciliation process.
Reparations.
I don't think those things are happening. But for the sake of discussion, do you imagine that if all that occurred, Muslims would grant Israel peace? I do not, not for a minute.

I'm a moral relativist, so of course.
There is no absolute universally true morality.
No supreme being speaketh it unto us.

As I said, never perfect, but workable. And I'm with you, when it comes to there being no god.

I oppose those things.
It's my opinion.
But they're being wrongful isn't not factual.

The perfect is the enemy of the good. I think if we want peace, we must accept a few philosophical axioms. I understand relativism, I just think it's monumentally impractical.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
I don't think those things are happening. But for the sake of discussion, do you imagine that if all that occurred, Muslims would grant Israel peace? I do not, not for a minute.

Maybe some Muslims won't. I'd be willing to bet that some nationalistic folks that also happen to be Muslim won't. But it's worth it to try.

One of my criticisms about any religiously-based state is that the combination of faith-based idealism and state nationalism lead to extremely irrational violence and governance. I try to distinguish between the religious individuals that make up a faith and a state that has an identity associated with religion. This goes for all faiths. Once a religious group associates their nation with their faith, how is one to adequately compromise and work towards positive relationships with others? It's certainly possible, but "My nation is God's (whatever name is given for your deity) nation" gets in the way of accepting that "One Nation Under God" is really just "One Nation Amongst Others in a Global Civilization."

Note: I am not antisemitic. Judaism is a fine religious faith with beautiful customs and beliefs. I am just critical of Israel's response while also accepting that a Muslim state can also be capable of horrible imperialistic actions. That includes understanding that my own country that likes to cosplay as a religious state sometimes is very much responsible for some of the violence that occurs in the Middle East from our own imperialistic actions that involve killing innocent people.

PS: Nothing against cosplaying. :) Best word I could think of on a Sunday morning to describe a country founded as a secular state that uses terms like "One Nation Under God" and "In God We Trust" and has a history of using religion to subjugate other people.
 
Last edited:
Top