Israelis created Gaza. To host Palestinian refugees, to give them a home.What do you mean by this?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Israelis created Gaza. To host Palestinian refugees, to give them a home.What do you mean by this?
Israelis created Gaza. To host Palestinian refugees, to give them a home.
In 2005, Israeli Prime Minister Sharon ordered the removal of Israeli settlers and soldiers from Gaza. Israel and its Supreme Court formally declared an end to occupation, saying it "had no effective control over what occurred" in Gaza. However, the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and many other international bodies and NGOs continue to consider Israel to be the occupying power of the Gaza Strip as Israel controls Gaza Strip's airspace, territorial waters and controls the movement of people or goods in or out of Gaza by air or sea.Israelis created Gaza. To host Palestinian refugees, to give them a home.
I'm agreeing with you.That is what I said
I wasnt referring to your statement.I think you read into what wasn’t there
How kind of Israel to 'create' a reservation for a a diaspora that they turned into homeless refugeesIsraelis created Gaza. To host Palestinian refugees, to give them a home.
It is clear from the above, that Israel has become more emboldened with their capital being
transferred from Tel-Aviv to Jerusalem, and intend to quieten any opposition .. one way or another.
It is obvious to me, that a people imprisoned in Gaza behind borders that are manned by Israel
will eventually result in disaster.
Well, if you choose to annex territory in an undisputed violation of international law, it is the business of the international community.BTW, what business is it of yours or the Palestinians where Israel chooses to locate its capital?
We're talking about Jerusalem minus the West Bank, which is part of Israel proper.Well, if you choose to annex territory in an undisputed violation of international law, it is the business of the international community.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 478 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Jerusalem minus the West Bank is just West Jerusalem.We're talking about Jerusalem minus the West Bank, which is part of Israel proper.
No .. I am not justifying any 'act of war' on either side .. I am just using my common sense, as to WHY 7 Oct. happened.And that somehow justifies Hamas' killing, mutilating, and kidnapping of well over 1000 innocent civilians?
That seems a rather unnecessary remark..BTW, what business is it of yours or the Palestinians where Israel chooses to locate its capital?
Jerusalem minus the West Bank is just West Jerusalem.
Israel previously claimed that the entirety of Jerusalem was their capital in the Jerusalem Law, which even the courts in Israel have considered to be an annexation claim. It's completely reasonable for Palestinians and the international community to be concerned about this.
"Common sense" minus "common decency" is not acceptable imo.No .. I am not justifying any 'act of war' on either side .. I am just using my common sense, as to WHY 7 Oct. happened.
That seems a rather unnecessary remark..
The UN, at the time, warned Trump against collaborating with Israel over moving its capital to Jerusalem.
The whole world knows that the issue is controversial, and one of the main causes of conflict.
It is why the British gave Jordan the role of overseeing the Holy precinct .. to keep the peace.
It would appear that the way Israel intends to "keep the peace", is by sheer force .. it CANNOT succeed.
..unfortunately for ALL of us!
I know why Israel is doing what it is doing .. and as I say, I am not justifying the actions of either side.What Israel is doing is for defensive purposes after the Oct. 7th massacre, and Hamas must be removed or all we will be doing is seeing repeat after repeat after...
Is this not little more than a back-handed appeal to moral equivalency?I'm not about to excuse atrocities nor put them on a scale to determine who is more evil but ...
Good question… any viewpoints?Gazans became Gazans in 2005.
What have they been doing, specifically, to work for a brighter future for their own children, to favor good relations with Israel and other countries?
For 17 years?
I wrote I was not going there but asking how the cycle of hatred and atrocities can be ended. Again that is my point. My followup post illustrated how at least some Israelis are viewing the horror and the Nazi-like statements of a few Jewish members of the current government.Is this not little more than a back-handed appeal to moral equivalency?
I've nothing to add except that I find it speciousTwo words: Pearl Harbor.
While convenient if it happened, it is important to note that Israel used to have settlements in Gaza. Israel's unilateral decision to dismantle them means they were not really all that important. Keeping Gaza under control was and is the top priority.
The main motive is to win the war, in both cases. The strategy is to bomb certain locations, at the cost of civilian lives, to weaken the enemy forces, in both cases. The probability of success is high, in both cases.
Nuking Japan saved american lives, but it is hard to argue that it saved more japanese civilian lives than the alternatives.
I've nothing to add except that I find it specious
& evil to justify Israel's nuking Palestinians.