Gambit
Well-Known Member
Nope. You have failed to demonstrate its plausibility.
What you have clearly demonstrated is that QM allows for speculations of woo. But that was a given and previously established.
Give it up.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nope. You have failed to demonstrate its plausibility.
What you have clearly demonstrated is that QM allows for speculations of woo. But that was a given and previously established.
Are you really this insane?No. You need to look at what those scientists are actually saying, not what you wish they were saying.
Are you really this insane?
Are you at all attractive? Your idiocy has to be compensated.You're considering my sanity by degrees from one opinion I stated? Now that's crazy.
Do entanglement and nonlocality imply that everything is interdependent and interconnected?
(Why is this religiously significant? Because spirituality can be defined as the transcendental experience of interdependence and interconnection.)
Entanglement and nonlocality only mean that quantum transactions take place outside of our four dimensions. Yeah that pretty much shows that everything is interconnected, but I don't know what that has to do with anything except to explain quantum weirdness and the EPR Paradox.
I'm not going to try to top that.
But perhaps time is not a dimension? Perhaps time is an effect of the universe moving from one level of complexity/density to another?
More artifact of perception.
Either time is a dimension which only exists in the universe, or is nullified/swamped by numerous/infinite multi-dimensions in the quantumworld "outside" of it. As Wheeler said to Feinman:
"I think I know why all electrons have the same mass and charge."
"Why?"
"Because they're all the same electron."
Electrons may have the same mass, but they won't be the same charge, if they are anti-electrons or positrons, hence positive-charged electrons.
With antimatters, all electrical charges are the exact opposites.
And the "quantumworld" you are talking about, are not from another dimension or another universe, and they are not outside of time.
No, I will give you that. They are not interchangeable. But they do have same characteristics, they just have the opposite charges to their normal counterparts, and is that opposite charges that make them different.Positrons aren't electrons, but even if they were interchangeable, the point is still made.
But if you have a basis for another theory, I'd like to hear it.
No, our universe can best be thought of as suspended in or extracted from that quantumworld--what they're calling dark matter now. Dark matter is also the likely propulsion behind the newly discoverd acceleration in the expansion of the universe. Particles that get entangled and are non-local do so in that quantumworld until such time as they become unentangled and local again. And being outside of time (timeless) is the only way to explain entanglement, non-locality and the EPR Paradox--though it's easy to declare otherwise.
The whole "outside of time" can only be possible if we accept the very theoretical multiverse cosmologies.
But I don't see "outside of time" as being "timeless". Time will exist, no matter what; it just doesn't mean time don't exist.
Without time, as in being "timeless", there can be change. For timeless to be even possible, everything will be static and unchangeable.
I don't see outside of time and timeless to be the same thing as you.
And lastly, I don't it is possible to be "outside of time" if there is only one universe.
That's my opinions about "outside of time" and about "timeless".
And nothing I have read indicate that entanglement and non-locality being "outside of time" or "timeless". All that quantum entanglement indicates, is that physical properties of particles "may be" paradox to one another, not that time would be different, which is what you are suggesting.
I hoped any of the above, make sense.