ragordon168
Active Member
'I'll leave that to creationist scientists' is a claim used by many on this forum when they run out of things to back up their beliefs. Unfortunately this doesnt work as creation science is worthless.
when a scientist does an experiment he will go in with a blank mind, he knows either his hypothesis will prove correct or incorrect.
a creationist scientist however goes in already with the preconception that he will be correct in his assumption and if his expiriment disproves his theory then he will claim the experiment is improperly set up and giving bad results - regardless of how often he modifies and repeats the experiment, he will always be right and the data wrong.
going in to the experiment with the ardent belief you will be right and not accepting the result when they disprove you means you can never carry out proper scientific expiriments.
now there is no problem with being religious and agreeing with mainsream science. these two things are not mutually exclusive but believing in creationism against all evidence is nonsensical.
when a scientist does an experiment he will go in with a blank mind, he knows either his hypothesis will prove correct or incorrect.
a creationist scientist however goes in already with the preconception that he will be correct in his assumption and if his expiriment disproves his theory then he will claim the experiment is improperly set up and giving bad results - regardless of how often he modifies and repeats the experiment, he will always be right and the data wrong.
going in to the experiment with the ardent belief you will be right and not accepting the result when they disprove you means you can never carry out proper scientific expiriments.
now there is no problem with being religious and agreeing with mainsream science. these two things are not mutually exclusive but believing in creationism against all evidence is nonsensical.