• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who were the first Yathrib converts?

stevecanuck

Well-Known Member
I always found it strange that Mohamed endlessly repeated Old Testament stories to the Meccans in the hope that it would cause them to convert to Islam. Those stories came from a book they didn't believe in and were about a god they didn't believe in. I find it less surprising that people from Yathrib would be more open to him given that they believed those stories in the first place.

That leads to my question. Who were the majority of Mohamed's first converts in Yathrib? Were they Jews?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Polytheists. Ka'aba had 360 idols (as I remember). Yeah, Allah wanted Jews to accept Mohammad. He even asked Muslims to turn towards Jerusalem for prayers (though he changed that after Mohammad came to power).
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Polytheists. Ka'aba had 360 idols (as I remember). Yeah, Allah wanted Jews to accept Mohammad. He even asked Muslims to turn towards Jerusalem for prayers (though he changed that after Mohammad came to power).
As far as i know, what you said here is correct understanding
 
Polytheists. Ka'aba had 360 idols (as I remember). Yeah, Allah wanted Jews to accept Mohammad. He even asked Muslims to turn towards Jerusalem for prayers (though he changed that after Mohammad came to power).

That is the traditional Islamic narrative sure, but there are plenty of reasons to consider it is more theologically motivated myth than actual history.

The Quran seems to assume the audience is quite familiar with the stories and characters it references as it doesn't explain anything about them.

It more reflects a Judaeo-Christian environment, slightly more towards the latter.

The idea that the Arabian peninsular was an isolated pagan backwater is not true. It was plugged into the power networks of the region and had been a place of conflict between Jews and Christians for a couple of centuries before Muhammad's time.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
It more reflects a Judaeo-Christian environment, slightly more towards the latter.
There are not many Christian tribes mentioned. They were mostly Jewish. Many of Mohammad's wives were from Jewish tribes, except for
Maria bint Shamʿūn (Maria al-Qibtiyya) who was an Egyptian Coptic slave (her status as Mohammad's wife is not clear).
 

Shakeel

Well-Known Member
Another useless topic to try and muddy the waters if possible.

The Qur'an does not require the reader to be a Christian or a Jew to believe in it. Polytheists became Muslim and Jews became Muslim and Christians and Hindus and atheists became Muslim.
 
There are not many Christian tribes mentioned. They were mostly Jewish. Many of Mohammad's wives were from Jewish tribes, except for
Maria bint Shamʿūn (Maria al-Qibtiyya) who was an Egyptian Coptic slave (her status as Mohammad's wife is not clear).

Things like this are why another poster here keeps making threads about non-Muslims who are ardent hadith believers.

This is all just hadith/sirat literature which non-Muslims should probably treat with a fair degree of scepticism given the overall content

The idea he was illiterate and came from a pagan backwater is a bit like the virgin birth: a miracle that attests to his status.

Note that the early Muslims supposedly fled to Christian Axum (Ethiopia), a Roman aligned local power who had been active in wars against Persian aligned Jewish tribes in the Arabian Peninsular in the century leading up to Muhammad's birth.

There is a reasonable chance 'Muhammad's people' were one of the Roman aligned tribes hired as mercenaries or operating as suppliers to the empire.

except for
Maria bint Shamʿūn (Maria al-Qibtiyya) who was an Egyptian Coptic slave (her status as Mohammad's wife is not clear).

Her status as anything to do with Muhammad is not clear given the story of how she came to be Muhammad's wife is rather fantastical.

If they have a historical root, the story of the letters to Mukawkis likely relate to the later communication between ibn al-As and The Patriarch Cyrus. There are multiple independent sources that acknowledge the communication between Cyrus and ibn al-As. A marriage alliance was also proposed between the general and a Byzantine Princess (assuming he converted of course).

On the other hand, Cyrus wasn't even in Egypt at the right time to communicate with Muhammed, and the idea he sent some Christian slaves in tribute to a 'heretic' prophet of minor importance is quite dubious.

She could be real, but 'acquired' in a different way.
It could be an telescoping of later factual info about someone into the prophetic biography.
It could just be a trope of a powerful 'enemy' showing respect to Muhammad thus attesting to his special status (see the other letters he supposedly wrote. The story about Heraclius is obviously a total fabrication).
 
Top