Myself being a veteran(and not just someone related to a bunch of military), I completely agree with his non-intervention foreign policy as well as his interpretation of our actions in the world today.
Being a small businessman, I completely agree with his economic fundamentals and method to implement those changes.
As a humanitarian(I actually put my money where my mouth is), I completely support his method to save entitlements, and promote the best interests of the American lower class.
As a frequent international traveler, I completely agree with his ideas on eliminating foreign aid and opening up trade.
And for Ron Paul being a Doctor, I love his solutions for health care. It's too bad that in interviews and during debates, he can't elaborate more than 0.01% of his solutions in the set time. After reading many of his books, he's spot on! And when you read the blogs of leading doctors/health personalities(that aren't linked to big-pharma), Ron's views and ideas line up to help the average person far more than the lobbyist controlled members in Washington.
As a Libertarian, he doesn't go anywhere near far enough to run for the Libertarian party by today's standards. But he actually fits in perfectly with the "Old Right" republican guidelines. It's the neo-conservative wing that is making the Republican Party look bad, much like the federalist/neo-progressive wing of the Democratic Party is making the democratic party look bad. The neo-conservative hijacking of the republican party shouldn't push perception into making people believe that Ron Paul does not fit with the fundamental ideas of the Republican Party, this whole, he should run as a Libertarian is just media fodder from the neo-conservative media heads.
Ron Paul is right for our problems today. This man has changed the world.
I agree with Ron's stances 98% of the time, but he's old.. HEY! I should vote for someone I barely agree with just because they are younger. LMAO!!!