Scourge of the Gods
Member
This is, to me, one of the most fascinating aspects of Jainism. The official founder of Jainism, Mahavira, died at the age of 72. However, that is considered to be a short lifespan by Jains because they believe that the universe began in a state of perfection and gradually degraded over time. Therefore, the 23 Tirthankaras who preceded Mahavira all had much longer lifespans than he had, the longest being the first Tirthankara, Rishaba, who supposedly lived to the mind-boggling age of 4 quintillion years. My question to members of this forum who are Jains or who have a knowledge of Jainism is this: do Jains literally believe that the Tirthankaras, as well as other human beings who were alive during those time periods, really lived to such advanced ages? I often suspect that perhaps the ancient Indians had a different way of keeping track of time, and maybe there are mistranslations of lifespans and dates in history when people try to convert them into our modern Western calendar. I would not, however, didcount the possiblity that Jains literally believe in those long lifespans since many Jews and Christians, for example, believe that many people in ancient times lived to be several hundreds of years old. The difference is that in order for the lifespans of the Tirthankaras to be real, the universe would have to be much older than scientists say it is. This is in stark contrast to many fundamentalist Christians who believe that the universe is much younger than scientists say it is. This brings me to my second question. Exactly what number do Jains put on the age of our present universe? Rishaba lived to be four quintillion years old and he wasn't even the first human being. Finally, how does Hinduism compare with Jainism concerning their beliefs in ancient lifespans and the age of the universe? Thanks in advance to anyone who can proide any insight into this topic.