What is happening here is that
• Biblical God includes the Lord, and God, when written in greek language, and english
• because scholars and churches have been trying for ages to separate jesus from JHVH, they delineate the name Lord, where it shouldn't be delineated.
• the greek and english language usage of Lord, correlates to aspect of God, that is worshipped, called God, [Elohim, so forth.
• Judaic belief has either name for Lord, and He is called God. I call this Elohim or God, thusly
• Yehudah and Judah are named after the 'true God', at least that is my interpretation of the verse
• we therefore have Judaic God, as JHVH, and we do place Him as the personal aspect of God.
• The Greek bible, using God Theos, and Lord Kurios, delineates between God, and the Lord.
• Jesus correlates to the Lord, aspect, in the text, therefore when the Bible says there is only one Lord, Jesus Christ, this means the 'Lord' in the Old Testament, is either Jesus Himself, or the over-self association. Otherwise you derive two different gods Jesus being the Tetragrammaton .
• therefore because we have Judaic belief, and Jesus basically tells us that that is the religion construct, we derive a necessary
Jehovah
Jesus
Holy Spirit,
In Christian belief, Judaic Christian belief.
This doesn't really match, the separate persons trinity because the totally distinct persons trinity idea, means that Jesus is the Tetragrammaton , and the other aspect is the 'other god'
•
This is apples and oranges, obviously, and further obfuscated by established churches now saying that there "pater" aspect, , is the Tetragrammaton, where they didn't before. So these churches now have a mix n match that doesn't work with the text, and doesn't match their trinity concept, as it means a contradiction when they say that the "pater" is the Tetragrammaton.
•
arguments or comments welcome
