Finished watching the whole video from the site. I had a few issues with it, but the biggest thing, which I think is most important and which his main argument is resting on, is the part about resurrection taking work on our part to bring to pass and that it may be an ordinance of the Priesthood.
I've never heard either of these concepts before, but he presented it as a doctrine of the Church. If it is, his argument works very well, because the whole thing is about us making increasingly better technology to improve ourselves and each other. However, I wasn't aware that it was a doctrine of the Church.
I'm also a little shaky on the "doctrine" that resurrection will be progressive on an individual basis. I know not everyone will be resurrected at once, and it will be progressive in the sense of one person getting resurrected before another. However, I've also never heard of the doctrine of a person getting resurrected or transfigured over a period of time. Whatever happened to "We shall be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye" (paraphrasing scripture)?
Basically, I agree that there are some interesting parallels, but I don't buy the complete package.
I will try to provide some outlook on how the resurrection will take place. the following I have transcribed from the book: The Plan of Salvation: Understanding our Divine Origin and Destiny, by Matthew B. Brown:
Jesus Christ took up his body again "by the power of the spirit" (2 Nephi 2:8) It appears the same mechanism will play a part in the resurrection of each son and daughter of God. It was Joseph Smith's teaching that God [will] bring [the dead] up again, clothed upon and quickened by the Spirit of the great God." This may not be the only mechanism that plays part in the resurrection process, however. Gospel scholar Robert J. Matthews notes:
Any Doctrine or ordinance as fundamental to man's eternal salvation as the resurrection of the dead is of necessity regulated and performed by the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood. It is also a part of the patriarchal order of the family. So far as the celestial kingdom is concerned, the resurrection is a family event. We would at first naturally suppose that Jesus would resurrect Himself, but perhaps he did not. Jesus did not baptize himself. The clear rendering of Acts 2:22-24, 32; 3:12-15; 5:30-32.. represents Peter saying on three separate occasions that God raised up Jesus from the dead. If we read those passages literally and combine that concept with the teaching of President [Brigham] Young and Elder [Erastus] Snow, that only a resurrected being can perform a resurrection, we may gain an insight to the resurrection process as a patriarchal family order in which a resurrected father would resurrect his son and so forth.
Brigham Yiung put forward the idea in one of his discourses that "some person holding the keys of the Resurrection, having previously passed through the same ordeal, will be delegated to resurrect our bodies." He also explained that mortals do not currently possess "the ordinance and keys of the resurrection. They will be given to those who have passed off this stage of action and have received their bodies again... They will be ordained, by those who hold they keys of the resurrection, to go forth and resurrect the saints." Elder Erastus Snow was even more specific about who would be granted this sacred privilege. He said that those who have been "crowned kings and high priests with God and the Lamb...shall...carry on the work of redemption and resurrection of the Saints of God." Such an idea is confirmed by Charles W. Penrose, who says that "in the resurrection [husbands and wives] stand side by side and hold dominion together. Every man who overcomes all things and is therefore entitled to inherit all things, receives power to bring up his wife to join him in the possession and enjoyment thereof."
President Young said that after the Prophet Joseph Smith had been resurrected he would be delegated "the keys of the resurrection" for the last dispensation and would then "seal this authority upon others" Ibid., 15:137-139