The Metaphysical Origin of Division and Conflict.

[John D. Brey]

Division and conflict are a subset of unity and peace. In scripture, the origin of the division that leads to both unity and its adjunct --conflict ---occurs for mankind when the two identical twins, ha-adam and the clone later named Eve, are divided by means of a surgical procedure (Genesis 2:21) that leads to the novelty (so far as the original humans are concerned) of dual-gender. The creation of dual-gender for the human race presuppose mankind's fall into the animal realm from a prelapsarian perch as far above the animal realm as heaven is above earth.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

Division and conflict are a subset of unity and peace. In scripture, the origin of the division that leads to both unity and its adjunct --conflict ---occurs for mankind when the two identical twins, ha-adam and the clone later named Eve, are divided by means of a surgical procedure (Genesis 2:21) that leads to the novelty (so far as the original humans are concerned) of dual-gender. The creation of dual-gender for the human race presuppose mankind's fall into the animal realm from a prelapsarian perch as far above the animal realm as heaven is above earth.

Without getting into the exegesis (which has been done elsewhere), the first human possesses no dualistic-gender but merely a body that's female. According to scripture material is taken from the original human body in order to clone a facsimile or replica of the original human body producing the original identical twins. At this point unity is natural since but for the fact that one of the twins comes before the other they're identical such that without manifestable difference there's no cause for division.

Nevertheless scripture relates that even before the material taken from the first human is cloned to produce the second, the origin of division, if not conflict and evil, enters the narrative prior to the manufacture of the identical twin of ha-adam. The opening on the first human's body where material was taken to produce the clone is said to be closed up סגר creating a natural suture science has labeled the perineal, or penile, raphe.

The acceptance of the Phallus is immoral. It has always been thought of as hateful; it has been the image of Satan, and Dante made it the central pillar of hell.

Otto Weininger, Sex and Character.​

John

 

[AlexanderG]

I never know what the central point is of any of your posts. Are you saying penises are demonic? Or that the creation of women from men is what introduced division and conflict in the world?

I know from past discussions with you that you have a very low opinion of women and their supposedly inferior intellect and emotional stability.

 

[John D. Brey]

I never know what the central point is of any of your posts. Are you saying penises are demonic? Or that the creation of women from men is what introduced division and conflict in the world?

In the Masoretic Text, which is a Jewish interpretation of the Torah Text, allegedly the original human is male, such that the second human coming out of the male is seen as secondary and thus inferior. The argument in this thread is that that interpretation is both backward and wrong. The identical twins ha-adam and Eve both had female bodies and since they were the whole of humanity at the time, they represented the non-existence of dual-gender in the origin of the human species.

Those with scientific educations are no doubt aware that the original lifeforms on earth were all female up until a particular point in evolution. When males evolved they evolved out of females such that if any gender is secondary, and inferior, it's the male, and not the female. We can know from science that the so-called male is really just an evolutionary tweak of the original female. And since for a long time there were females, and no males, the idea that males come first, and are the original, is ******* science, like geocentrism. That Judaism panders to that ******* idea through their evangelization of the world by means of the Masoretic Text is part and parcel of the error that's in the line of sight of this thread.

Scientifically speaking, androcentrism is to geocentrism as Gomer Pyle is to Albert Einstein. The fact that in the aggregate Western Civilization bases its metaphysics on the Masoretic Malfeasance of androcentrism is so absurd and unbelievable that only those who appreciate R.B. Thieme, Jr.'s, teaching concerning the "Angelic Conflict" are able to account for how something as scientifically, philosophically, and theologically asinine as androcentrism could be held as viable by the majority of the elite thinkers of the Western world.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

Are you saying penises are demonic?

Ha-adam and Eve were technically speaking identical twins. And yet, ironically, maybe even demonically, before the surgeon who removes the flesh from ha-adam manufactures Eve from it, Eve being an identical facsimile of ha-adam (a clone of ha-adam), he sutures סגר shut the outer-labia of ha-adam to form the anomalous flesh that's the origin of all the division in the world of humankind.

So yes, in a real sense the phallus is the cause of division. And in a demonic manner since the quasi-divine surgeon who sutures shut ha-adam's vagina to form the evolutionary anomaly known as the phallus, chooses to do so prior to the manufacture of Eve, apparently so that Eve won't even know she's technically equal to ha-adam, that they are of the same flesh. She's made to believe Adam is endowed with flesh that gives him authority over her and that that flesh is as seminal to his original body as her vagina is natural to her own body. She's not allowed to know that Adam's body is merely an evolutionary anomaly and that his original body is originally identical to hers. She's enslaved to androcentrism by the hand of the surgeon who chose to change Adam's body prior to manufacturing hers.

There's graft of a demonic level going on in the text of the Torah, and covered up and sanctified by the Masoretic version of that text since we know from science that the female form is original, and the male secondary. We know this from evolution, and from the fact that the default form in the womb is female such that the labial flesh is made to close up forming the perineal raphe only if that default form, of no fault of its own, starts to deform, for having been flooded with testosterone come, so to say, from, through, the testemony of the anomalous flesh.



John

 

[ajay0]

As per eastern philosophy, identification with functional identities of nation, occupation, gender, language, race, religion, sexuality is what fosters division and eventual conflict.

Our true identity is that of human beings, sentient beings and eternal souls or pure consciousness or the Self or Buddha nature.

Forgetting our true identity that fosters love and unity, we relate with functional identities that foster division and conflict. Our functional identities are useful in operating in this world, but people deludedly identify with it intensely due to lack of understanding of their true identity.

‘’When individuals of any age learn to turn inward and connect with their innate, divine nature and it’s Source, then, regardless of circumstances, they experience and express true peace and happiness. This is why spiritual education is the need of the hour.’’ ~ Dadi Ratan Mohini, Brahmakumaris

 

[John D. Brey]

As per eastern philosophy, identification with functional identities of nation, occupation, gender, language, race, religion, sexuality is what fosters division and eventual conflict.

Right. But in the metaphysics of division, the elements you list are necessary evils because of the origin of evil in the human race: Genesis 2:21 (where ha-adam, becomes the first transgendered human being).

Our true identity is that of human beings, sentient beings and eternal souls or pure consciousness or the Self or Buddha nature.

Right. Except that the polar-duality between soul and body got distorted (turned around) such that we are all, now, after Genesis 2:21, transgendered souls (souls that are made the slaves --wives --- of bodies).

Forgetting our true identity that fosters love and unity, we relate with functional identities that foster division and conflict. Our functional identities are useful in operating in this world, but people deludedly identify with it intensely due to lack of understanding of their true identity.

As I see it, we have a profound choice to make. It is a choice between favoring the old brain or favoring the new brain. More specifically, do we want our future to be driven by the processes that got us here, namely, natural selection, competition, and the drive of the selfish genes? Or, do we want our future to be driven by intelligence and its desire to understand the world?

Richard Dawkins, introducing Jeff Hawkins, One Thousand Brains: A New Theory of Intelligence (bracket mine, based on earlier comment in intro. Last quotation is Dawkins quoting Hawkins).


​

John

 

[dybmh]

The identical twins ha-adam and Eve both had female bodies

How do you reconcile this theory with Genesis 2:24? Are the two female bodies able to cleave to each other and become one flesh?

 

[John D. Brey]

How do you reconcile this theory with Genesis 2:24? Are the two female bodies able to cleave to each other and become one flesh?

When Jesus confronted the experts in the interpretation of the Law with not just a different interpretation of the Law, but one that purported to be based on a new reality, the experts in the Law naturally considered the new interpretation dubious. But when he showed them that his oral presentation of the written law was technically truer to the literal meaning of the written words than the traditional reading, they began to see him as not just dubious but dangerous if not evil.

Paul had a mystical experience which he interpreted in such a way that it shattered the traditional authority. He could not keep it intact; but since he did not wish to forgo the authority of the Holy Scripture as such, he was forced to declare that it was limited in time and hence abrogated. A purely mystical exegesis of the old words replaced the original frame and provided the foundation of the new authority which he felt called upon to establish. This mystic’s clash with religious authority was clear and sharp. In a manner of speaking, Paul read the Old Testament `against the grain.’ The incredible violence with which he did so shows not only how incompatible his experience was with the meaning of the old books, but also how determined he was to preserve, if only by purely mystical exegesis, his bond with the sacred text. The result was the paradox that never ceases to amaze us when we read the Pauline Epistles: on the one hand the Old Testament is preserved, on the other, its original meaning is completely set aside.

Gershom Scholem, On the Kabbalah and Its Symbolism, p. 14-15.​

What happened to the Jews with the advent of the Christian experience (the end of the beginning of the Law), is about to happen to the Christians with the advent of the end of the age. Everything Jews and Christians think they know about the Law, faith, and God's plan of salvation, is about to be transformed not by a bastardization of the holy text, but merely by reading it more literally than the old time religions could bring themselves to read it.

Adam and Eve were, in the most literal reading of the Hebrew text, twin sisters. But in verse 21 of Genesis 2, something nefarious occurs. Material is taken from ha-adam with which to clone his identical twin. But that material is set aside temporarily so that the very flesh from which the material came could be sutured shut to produce a transgendered being: Adam.

Every single male, save one, the Savior, is a transgendered-female and not, in fact, a male. This is biblical, historical, scientific, factual, and thus, in a real sense true. The fact that science hasn't taught this scientific-fact appears to be based mostly on androcentric bias that's hard-wired into the transgendered-female ---the so-called male --- with a pretty heavy gauged wire. We can know this since the surgeon in charge of the desecration left part of the wire cut off and just dangling there with enough high voltage flowing through it to jump-start the next Frankenstein monster, and or, to raise more Cain, when it's plugged into the default ---female ---- flesh.

The acceptance of the Phallus is immoral. It has always been thought of as hateful; it has been the image of Satan, and Dante made it the central pillar of hell.

Otto Weininger, Sex and Character.​

John

 

[John D. Brey]

Every single male, save one, the Savior, is a transgendered-female and not, in fact, a male. This is biblical, historical, scientific, factual, and thus, in a real sense true. The fact that science hasn't taught this scientific-fact appears to be based mostly on androcentric bias that's hard-wired into the transgendered-female ---the so-called male --- with a pretty heavy gauged wire. We can know this since the surgeon in charge of the desecration left part of the wire cut off and just dangling there with enough high voltage flowing through it to jump-start the next Frankenstein monster, and or, to raise more Cain, when it's plugged into the default ---female ---- flesh.

The acceptance of the Phallus is immoral. It has always been thought of as hateful; it has been the image of Satan, and Dante made it the central pillar of hell.

Otto Weininger, Sex and Character.​

The metaphysical origin of division and conflict is the origin of the fleshly male, and particularly the flesh that distinguishes male from female (Genesis 2:21). The creation of this flesh, secondary to the female flesh, and creating it as an adjunct to the female flesh, just before cloning the female flesh as the place to park the newfangled flesh, is so clearly a distortion of anything truly divine, holy, sacred, that the well-appointed symbol associated with the genesis of the Jewish race is taking a knife to the unseemly flesh and thereafter ritually bleeding it to death (brit milah).

Likewise, the Roman Catholic Church forbids its priests and nuns from even acknowledging the existence of this problematic flesh such that with this storm-cloud of historical witnesses we can hardly believe what we witness when science, philosophy, history, psychology, and even political science, feign ignorance of the fact that they themselves ignore the most problematic aspect of the metaphysics of division and conflict in their muddle-headed and vapid attempt to right the wrongs of society using the authority they gain from the very rod of authority that's the problem in the first place.



John

 

[dybmh]

the well-appointed symbol associated with the genesis of the Jewish race is taking a knife to the unseemly flesh and thereafter ritually bleeding it to death (brit milah).

I know that this is a strongly held belief, but, you're all wrong about the purpose of the brit milah. It's all about removing the foreskin as a source for negativity in the boys life. It has nothing to do with bleeding the penis to death or the unholiness of the penis.

Here's a detailed article on the subject.

Brit Mila - Circumcision | Live Kabbalah

 

[John D. Brey]

Likewise, the Roman Catholic Church forbids its priests and nuns from even acknowledging the existence of this problematic flesh such that with this storm-cloud of historical witnesses we can hardly believe what we witness when science, philosophy, history, psychology, and even political science, feign ignorance of the fact that they themselves ignore the most problematic aspect of the metaphysics of division and conflict in their muddle-headed and vapid attempt to right the wrongs of society using the authority they gain from the very rod of authority that's the problem in the first place.

There is neither Jew nor Gentile, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Galatians 3:28.​

In Paul's "mystical exegesis" (Scholem) he zeroes in on the three entities who benefit most from the metaphysics of difference that originate in Genesis 2:21. First is the male, who, so far as empirical experience is concerned, is the original flesh, though that's a phallic-facade of the highest order. Next is the allegedly freeborn male or female who, since they're born into the slavery of difference, and conflict, are only free if we use the word too freely. Last is the Jew whose originality in opposition to the Christian ----who (the Christian), like the female, appears at first glance to come after the Jew, is a facade similar to the antecedence of the male to the female.



John

 

[John D. Brey]

I know that this is a strongly held belief, but, you're all wrong about the purpose of the brit milah. It's all about removing the foreskin as a source for negativity in the boys life. It has nothing to do with bleeding the penis to death or the unholiness of the penis.

Here's a detailed article on the subject.

Brit Mila - Circumcision | Live Kabbalah

Excellent article nearly every word of which has been dealt with here in the forum. Nevertheless, each of the rituals and concepts in the article were mostly exegeted in different threads here so that there might not be a condensed or comprehensive presentation of them all together.

Since nothing is as important as the topic at your link it needs to be dealt with in its own thread and fully understood before the topic in this thread can hope to make sense.



John

 

[dybmh]

Excellent article nearly every word of which has been dealt with here in the forum. Nevertheless, each of the rituals and concepts in the article were mostly exegeted in different threads here so that there might not be a condensed or comprehensive presentation of them all together.

Since nothing is as important as the topic at your link it needs to be dealt with in its own thread and fully understood before the topic in this thread can hope to make sense.



John

OK, thank you