• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The circular reasoning of Evolution and billions of years believers.

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
All proved that evolution and billions of years are delusional
Nope, not even close.
the Big Bang is dead.
Nope, not even close.
The red shift theory is dead.
Nope, not even close.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Nope, not even close.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Nope, not even close.
Atheism is dead.
Nope, not even close.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Nope, not even close.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Nope, not even close.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.
Nope, not even close.
The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
Nope, not even close.
So there is no expansion of the universe.
Nope, not even close.
So no Big Bang,
Nope, not even close.

Do you get some sort of credit from Satan for overtime?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Nope, not even close.

Do you get some sort of credit from Satan for overtime?
Very informative.

Redshift theory is in real jeopardy.

Anomalies in the count of low red shift quasars.

Anomalies in the Counts of Low Redshift Quasars

https://assa.saao.ac.za/wp-content/...liffe-A-review-of-anomalous-redshift-data.pdf

Redshift Anomalies and the Big Bang – Anthony Beckett

Is a new anomaly affecting the entire Universe?

Galaxies and the Universe - Alternate Approaches and the Redshift Controversy
 

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
Again, merely repeating the same nonsense over and over does not make it any truer.

But they at least mix it up for us. There's stupid question repeat day, unsubstantiated claims day, misinterpret the bible day and today looks like post the same psuedoscience links over and over day.

I wonder what tomorrow will be! I'm gonna ring sportsbet and put $10 on stupid question repeat day.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Again, merely repeating the same nonsense over and over does not make it any truer.
The Big Bang died of stupidity.

 

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
The Big Bang died of stupidity.

Again, merely repeating the same nonsense over and over does not make it any truer.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Again, merely repeating the same nonsense over and over does not make it any truer.
Very many are proclaiming the Big Bang falsified by the data from the James Webb Telescope. It is rare when in a discussion one side has their own experts testify against their own side. That is what had happened here.

 

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
Very many are proclaiming the Big Bang falsified by the data from the James Webb Telescope. It is rare when in a discussion one side has their own experts testify against their own side. That is what had happened here.

Again, merely repeating the same nonsense over and over does not make it any truer.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
A theory is used to make predictions and if they turn out false then the theory is false .
And a theory must be able to stand against the evidence. The James Webb Telescope proved the Big Bang false with both methods of falsification. The look at it and found it to be a lie. The heavens declare the glory of God.

James Webb Space Telescope Shows Big Bang Didn’t Happen? Wait… – NewsBeezer
Wow.
You are either flat out lying or you do not know squat about science.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I'm rubber and you are glue...
Your no answer is proof of your circular reasoning and that evolution and billions of years are false. The Big Bang is being discarded by your own experts. You need to be reprogrammed.

 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
The Big Bang is being discarded by your own experts. You need to be reprogrammed.

You really should read the articles you link. Nothing in this suggests the big bang is false or the universe is younger than billions of years. If anything, it might mean the universe is older than thought. More likely, however, is a modification of the model of galaxy formation, or a data problem.

From the article:

Further observation of the galaxies should better clarify their ages and masses. It might show that the observations are incorrect: that supermassive black holes at their centre are heating the galaxies up, so they look more massive than they are, or that they are actually from a later time than expected but look older because of imaging problems.
But if they are confirmed, then astronomers may have to change their understanding of the cosmos and how galaxies grow, to adjust their model to account for the unusually large and mature galaxies.

Exodus 23:1
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
What a joke that evolution. Who could actually believe it?
But that is what circular reasoning leads to, delusion.

the Big Bang is dead.
The red shift theory is dead.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Atheism is dead.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.

The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
So there is no expansion of the universe.
So no Big Bang,
But then there should just be ghostly neutrinos and nothing else.




What a surprise. Still no citation of a science paper, no quoting, no explanation of how it is circular.

My perfect track record of predictive capabilities stands tall. And will continue to be so.

It's getting boring.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
You really should read the articles you link. Nothing in this suggests the big bang is false or the universe is younger than billions of years. If anything, it might mean the universe is older than thought. More likely, however, is a modification of the model of galaxy formation, or a data problem.

From the article:

Further observation of the galaxies should better clarify their ages and masses. It might show that the observations are incorrect: that supermassive black holes at their centre are heating the galaxies up, so they look more massive than they are, or that they are actually from a later time than expected but look older because of imaging problems.
But if they are confirmed, then astronomers may have to change their understanding of the cosmos and how galaxies grow, to adjust their model to account for the unusually large and mature galaxies.

Exodus 23:1
They are all showing that the Big Bang and redshift theories are unable to withstand the evidence and have failed in their predictions.

The Bible says that the Earth hangs on nothing. Job 26:7 written over 3500 years ago. Your pagan forbears had it on a turtle or Atlas holding it up.
 
Top