• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Shatnez: Prohibition on Manifest Masculinity.

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
Although shatnez is generally speaking a biblical prohibition against mixing wool and linen, Rabbi Samson R. Hirsch explains that it represents, or symbolizes, any, and all, mixing of unlike things that shant be mixed without transgressing God's plan and design. Wool and linen can be worn together, unified in one's clothing, so long as the two are not mixed. The prohibition is about "mixing" unlike things, and not about unifying them or having them in close proximity. As Rabbi Hirsch points out, shatnez forbids breeding unlike species since that's the quintessential "mixing" of unlike things.

Which brings us to ha-adam in the garden.

The first human is a unique, genderless, species. Originally, as originally designed, ha-adam can't mix, or breed, with an unlike species, since, as the sole genderless species, God's original design made that impossible. The rabbis imply that when ha-adam was seeking a "help-mate" or partner among the other creatures in the garden he was looking for a creature to mix with. But by God's design he found that impossible.

Which leads from the original design and plan, to Genesis 2:21, the darkest verse in the Tanakh, and forthwith and with haste, to the original sin that's the original transgressing of God's original design.



John
 
Last edited:

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
Rabbinic Judaism holds that the priest's girdle could be shatnez.

Shatnez - Wikipedia

. . . Only if the tzitzit is baptized in techelet תכלת. . . Say that five times fast.

There's a reason why baptizing the tzitzit in techelet allows the apparent transgressing of the prohibition on wearing shatnez. It's what this thread is about.

Judaism calls the answer to the question a chok חק. It's not. And that's saying a hell of a lot.



John
 
Top