Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Me too. But even while being science ignorant science isn't an instrument to debunk religion. If it happens to put stress on a particular religious theory it isn't really disproving God but a conception linked to a belief in a particular God.mr.guy said:I'm far too ignorant of science at large.
Faults and contradictions in all religion can be found without relying upon science to find them, and since all religion is riddled with faults and contradictions, what should possess us to believe in any religion? I know plenty of Christians who dine regularly upon shellfish and wear clothing of mixed fibre even though the Christian bible admonishes them against these things, for example. Admittedly, its non-heterosexual followers are perhaps Christianity's greatest oxymoron. Do the religious take what they wish from religion, leaving aside what makes them uncomfortable?Sikhism said:are you an atheist because science have found faults and contridictions in all major relgions? just interested to know your main reasons.
thank you.
This sums up my feelings as well really. There is nothign at all to give reason to believe in god, only a few translated and re-translated scribbles are the foundation of religion. For me, I find it foolish to live your life in a certain way on the off chance that you will be rewarded when you die, its a terrible waste xdissonance said:I am an atheist simply because I have found no good reason to believe in God.
Remeber that many atheists are religious. Not all religions have deities spearheading them. Some religions don't appeal to the supernatural at all.Sikhism said:are you an atheist because science have found faults and contridictions in all major relgions? just interested to know your main reasons.
thank you.
dissonance said:I am an atheist simply because I have found no good reason to believe in God.
I'm not an atheist, but I do think the divine light or the ultimate reality or whatever you want to call it can as easily be expressed in atheistic terms as theistic terms, and that atheism is often superior -- intellectually, morally, and ... um ... spiritually -- to theism. All else being equal, the atheist is less likely than the theist to imagine that the universe shares his passions and prejudices, less likely to imagine that his preferences are moral absolutes, and less likely to imagine that he "knows" something without the least shred of evidence.Sikhism said:are you an atheist because science have found faults and contridictions in all major relgions? just interested to know your main reasons.
thank you.
Yep. I simply lack a belief in a god, that's all. Until there's actually a reason to be a theist (the sky gremlin is proven), I choose to side with logic and reason.ladylazarus said:I don't have a reason for being atheist. I simply have no reason to be a theist.
You make perfect sense you just called me inhuman.draqon_of_white_seas said:So what do atheists believe in when asked how they came to existence? Am I right that atheists claim that they simply do not know where they came from and therefore do not believe in anything. Am I right by saying that? If yes, then atheists do not understand that they are lying to themselves. The mind cannot leave a certain question unanswered, it will assume something, even if you do not recognize that you have assumed it. All I am saying here is that it is simply theoretically impossible to be a nonbeliever because you are not human if you do not believe in something. ( If I dont make sense to you, then :banghead3)
are you an atheist because science have found faults and contridictions in all major relgions?