How is the Gospel of Thomas different from the Christian Gospels?
No walking on water
No curing lepers
No multiplication of foodstuffs and wine
No raising the dead
No virgin birth
No satan-gods
No demon-gods
No angel-gods
No son of God-gods
No Jesus walking around like some zombie
No resurrection
No judgment day
No churches or giving money to churches
No praying
It's no big deal to mean mouth the Father
No creation
The Living Father never says or does anything, or has opinions.
No one sent Jesus
God isn't a publisher, Thomas wrote it.
Women have full equality.
No supernatural creatures or supernatural miracles whatsoever.
Not a single solitary parallel to Paul, (other than those with a common Hebrew Bible source)
[No Hell]
I'm sure I left a few out, any others anyone can think of?
Let's see now, we've had a claim that because he was here in the flesh, that meant he wasn't here in the flesh or at least had other options, and was a second century Gnostic for saying so.
And one about not bowing down to anyone born of woman, which includes the Jesus of Thomas and Christians, both of which explicitly says he had a mother. Jesus explicitly saying he's not God that was included apparantly by accident.
And one about being the light, meaning to the Greeks, the Hebrews and the Gospel of Thomas, being enlightened, being a person of light. Unlike the false image of things. Like the Christian saying stolen from Thomas about a person of light not hiding a light under a basket. Something about being enlightened more than others, making him a god somehow.
And the beautiful Greek story about there being only one God, one unified consciousness, whether you look under a stone or split a piece of wood, like Einstein, Jefferson, Spinoza and the historical Jesus of the Gospel of Thomas.
Nope, not a walking zombie showing off it's wounds, satan-god, or multiplication of foodstuffs in there.
John was edited to slander the doubting Gospel of Thomas. Thomas didn't believe in superstition, so the doubting Thomas meets the zombie and sees the error of his ways.
Which makes Thomas old enough that those that knew Jesus and Thomas were still around to refute that Thomas wrote it.