Proof of Jesus or Love

[questfortruth]

Does Love exist?
Yes.
God is Love.

ratiocinator: You're saying god is nothing but a human emotion. Rather silly and pointless redefinition of the word 'god'.

Do not put words in my mouth and do not fantasize over my proof.
It is much more than its symptoms. Love causes symptoms, the latter are emotions. Therefore, a good person is invaluable.

What about mri scans?

These are symptoms, but not cause of symptoms. These are simply the output.

Evidence please

My word. The word of the Master of Science and a honest man.

i prefer hard

I am hard. Under the hard is meant, that my personality is hard. Hence, my word is reliable.

which is not necessary reliable

But you could make a decision to consider me as competent. I bet, what if I would be famous as Hawking or Harry Potter, there would be no problem of trust.

With the stuff you post i can make no such decision. Hawking made mistakes, i i would only take his word if he provided evidence,as i ask you to do , and Harry Potter is fantasy

Under "Potter" I meant the actor of Potter. Who decides, that my text is not evidence? Me? I think, it is evidence. You? You think it is not. I and you are not crazy. Hence, we need authority higher than we. Jesus Christ. Let He tell who is right.

Bible does not interpret itself. Bible is fact. Any fact needs correct interpretation.

For example, the fossils of dinosaurs do not mean, that they are million years old.

 

[ChristineM]

It happens that @ratiocinator is correct. Both love and god can be observed on mri scans.

Love

God

 

[questfortruth]

It happens that @ratiocinator is correct. Both love and god can be observed on mri scans.

These are symptoms, but not cause of symptoms. These are simply the output.

 

[ChristineM]

These are symptoms, but not cause of symptoms. These are simply the output.

Evidence please

 

[questfortruth]

Evidence please

My word. The word of the Master of Science and a honest man.

 

[ChristineM]

My word. The word of the Master of Science and a honest man.

Right. Personally i prefer hard evidence like those mri scans i provided

 

[questfortruth]

i prefer hard

I am hard.

 

[ChristineM]

I am hard.

Do you mind, this is a child friendly forum.

 

[questfortruth]

Do you mind, this is a child friendly forum.

Under the hard is meant, that my personality is hard. Hence, my word is reliable.

 

[ChristineM]

Under the hard is meant, that my personality is hard. Hence, my word is reliable.

Your word is what you believe, which is not necessary reliable.

 

[questfortruth]

which is not necessary reliable

But you could make a decision to consider me as competent. I bet, what if I would be famous as Hawking or Harry Potter, there would be no problem of trust.

 

[ChristineM]

But you could make a decision to consider me as competent. I bet, what if I would be famous as Hawking or Harry Potter, there would be no problem of trust.

With the stuff you post i can make no such decision. Hawking made mistakes, i i would only take his word if he provided evidence,as i ask you to do , and Harry Potter is fantasy

 

[questfortruth]

With the stuff you post i can make no such decision. Hawking made mistakes, i i would only take his word if he provided evidence,as i ask you to do , and Harry Potter is fantasy

Under "Potter" I meant the actor of Potter. Who decides, that my text is not evidence? Me? I think, it is evidence. You? You think it is not. I and you are not crazy. Hence, we need authority higher than we. Jesus Christ. Let He tell who is right.

 

[Sheldon]

Bible is fact.

That claim is demonstrably false.

 

[Sheldon]

Hence, my word is reliable.

That sentence seems oddly incongruous, alongside your usual use of garbled English? It almost leaped out from your usual posts?

Lets take a look at your next post, as a point of comparison.

I bet, what if I would be famous as Hawking or Harry Potter, there would be no problem of trust.

Bizarre how your use of language snapped into focus there, but just for a small snippet of one post?