Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It was an actual gallows with real calls for the execution of Pence and other officials. No amount of denial will ever refute that.
The AP is as middle of the road as it gets. And NBC is very close to that. I do not know about the Michigan based news source, but I am pretty sure that you are terribly wrong there too.
I posted this for @Clizby Wampuscat a few minutes ago. Would be interested in how and why you would disagree with it. Suggest you read the article before answering.
It is interesting how those ratings change over the years. BT (Before Trump) FOX and CNN used to be mirrors of each other. Both skewing a bit for one party over the other and both fairly reliable. Trump managed to pull FOX way down and to the right (Down in this case being less reliable), and CNN did follow a little bit. They went a bit more left, and got almost out of the "skews left" and got a little less reliable. I ses that they are almost above the green line again and not as far left as they used to be. FOX has recovered some, but they still have a long way to go. It would be interesting to see a live motion graph of how the companies changed over the years in their ratings.I posted this for @Clizby Wampuscat a few minutes ago. Would be interested in how and why you would disagree with it. Suggest you read the article before answering.
By definition, every source is biased, but that doesn't preclude understanding these biases.
Here is a generally accepted rating source and an article on how it came to be.
Read it and see where your sources fall on this chart.
Opinion | Why I decided to rate the news
I also noticed that there are differences between web and TV versions of many inc. MSNBC CNN, FOX and OAN . The websites all rate better with Fox web way up in the good though conservative while Fox TV is barely out of propaganda.
All you have are whataboutisms. I already explained the problem with you posting those.
We know evidence and reality means nothing to you deniers.
Name-calling is no excuse for not providing evidence to back up your false claims.
Name calling? You're denying you are a denier of what occurred? Ok, how else should one be described?
Someone who recognizes that an art piece constructed for a protest is not the actual item that it represents.
Its not an art piece.
It is art, and J6 is nothing more than a liberal talking point (since they got nothing else).
All the way back to the George Floyd protests? You can check it out yourself. Most were peaceful. Guess what is boring as heck to see on the news? Just in case you did not know peaceful protests. They do not make the news. Violent protests on the other hand are fascinating to watch. So all of the news that we saw were of the violent protests.
It's not art, wasn't intended as art. Claiming anything else is nothing more than right denial of reality (since they got nothing else).
They actually don't. They show that you haven't read them.
It's much more than that. There's a trial coming up for Trump and his co-conspirators (at least, the ones who haven't flipped and made plea deals yet).
Ooooh! Another trial! Anything to boost Trump's polling numbers even more.
