This thread is called "music creation with AI"
AI does not create
It copies and mimics
Everything it does is derivative
It spews out soulless inhuman trash that is based on real things
I can't stand generative AI
AI doesn't create in the same way as humans does, but how many humans actually create something new? It's not like each and every musician out there create their own unique genre or type of music, more than the AI does. So I'm not really sure exactly what the difference is?
What do you think when you hear a modern music number? let's say a random hit at a given time, how much of that music isn't created using computers and samples etc. In many cases, the singer's voice is so autotuned that you might as well use an AI.
I think there is a valid argument to be had against AI, but I think it has to be better than what you are presenting, given how a lot of music is produced today.
How many of the big hits are actually written by the artists themselves?
When it comes down to it, I don't think the process is all that different. The musicians will also constantly change the stuff they make until they are happy with it. In my case, the AI generate something based on what I tell it, and then I tell it whether I like it or not. The AI simply emulate the musicians and singers and you the producer or what to say.
If you take Andy Warhol (I think he is unique in this):
In his 1960s studio – known as the Factory – he employed studio assistants to make his work for him. Warhol realised that he could increase the commercial productivity of his art more quickly by getting others involved in making it.
Yet, for some reason, this is perfectly acceptable.