• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mathematical Metaphysics Revisited

Ostronomos

Well-Known Member
INTRODUCTION In these early years of the new millennium, there has been considerable academic concern over the stubbornness of Cartesian dualism and the conceptual difficulty of uniting the mental and physical sides of reality. Meanwhile, it has gone all but unnoticed in academic circles that the formal aspect of this challenge was met decades COSMOS AND HISTORY 314 ago, and in the most effective possible way. This paper contains a brief introductory account of the work in question, including a highly simplified description of the logicomathematical reasoning needed for the proper high-level theoretical description of reality. Everything follows from the requirements of this objective. Aside from the author's own writings, there is as yet no well-defined field of mathematical metaphysics. Being an explanation of the author's previous work, this paper is largely an exercise in self-reference. The same applies to its bibliography. Conveniently enough, this is well in accord with a major theme herein emphasized, namely, the self-referential nature of reality.

http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.ph...e/618/1040

In other words, this paper introduces the mathematics that unites the mental and physical sides of reality, thus dissolving the infamous Cartesian dualism by proposing that reality is in fact not split at the highest level in which a mind distributes over the universe and responds to the individual's thought-generation. Using light.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Reality not arguable.

A human first natural living standing on a planet.

Human thinking the heavens that I live within surround the planet. Came out of the inside of that planet.

Science therefore does not exist.

Thinker.

Science never existed.

I however can think. And I wanted science. As a human.

Owns no correct thesis except for what a human created. Invention.

Maths was thought for design on how to gain a built invention only.

As everything else existed not by human maths but by the words natural and mass.

Say mass.
Say maths. Sounds similar. Might be your thinking problem.
 
Top