Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
"
You have not established that there is a pattern, but you believe there is a pattern without any real proof. Then you go on to say, "Blind faith is faith which does not recognize itself" and "our individual beliefs, are just that- beliefs not facts."
.
So we agree; denying the limitations of our own beliefs impedes scientific progress, if prevents us from moving beyond them.
A couple of examples for you from a couple of prominent atheists.
[Hoyle] found the idea that the universe had a beginning to be pseudoscience, resembling arguments for a creator, "for it's an irrational process, and can't be described in scientific terms" and hence rejected the evidence till his dying day
“Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact..." Dawkins
Whereas notable skeptics of atheism like Lemaitre and Planck, agreed more with you and I, on the problem of scientific dogma.
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. Max Planck