Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is true. It is the lowest form of legal evidence. Luckily there is more than that.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Judge dismisses defamation lawsuit against President Trump
- Thread starter Shaul
- Start date
Eye witness testimony that wasn’t refuted, repudiating or retracted? If you’re thinking of Ivana and the divorce testimony, think again. She later repudiated any rape allegations and said “That was all just the lawyers' talk”, she said, after having previously clarified she did not accuse him in “a literal or criminal sense”.
No there isn’t.
No it isn’t. There are other more plausible reasons for the payment.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
of course there is. We have the payments made for him. Do you have a logical explanation for them?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
they need a popcorn emoji here. It sound like it is story time.
Yes. The payments were made to silence the false allegations of an opportunist.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Shad
Veteran Member
Come now, do you really believe that in your heart of hearts?
Even I believe Trump had affairs.
Last edited:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
even if that was the case you just admitted that Trump broke the law.
There is a test. Stormy described Trump's unit. You have seen representations of it in this thread. If she was accurate that would bolster her credibility.
No, the payment were not made with his direct knowledge.
No, she claims to describe it. Her record on claims bearing up is terrible.
It makes more sense then otherwise. If Stormy Daniels had actual proof it would have come out by now. It hasn’t because she doesn’t have any.Come now, do you really believe that in your heart of hearts?
Then you believe despite a lack of evidence.
Shad
Veteran Member
No I just believe Ivana. I wasn't talking about Daniels.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Do you actually believe that nonsense? You do know that his lawyer recorded their calls, don't you? Why would someone make payments for Trump without his asking? Why would he pay someone back for payments that were made for him without his asking?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You have that backwards.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You have it backwards, as usual. Trump has been shown to be a liar time after time. What makes you follow a lying self serving fool?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
What makes you think that is the case? He did not find for Trump, he only threw out the case. For Stormy to have to pay his lawyers fees that sounds like he would have to file a lawsuit or win the one that he entered. Again, he did not win the case, it was thrown out before it went to trial. Please find a valid source that say Storm has to pay his fees.
Yes, I think this is generally true, but you need to evaluate the testimony on a case by case basis. I think people usually know who it is they have been *******, especially if it is someone famous.
No, actually I was thinking of Stephanie Clifford and Karen McDougal. For starters.
Shad
Veteran Member
Sure it needs to be evaluated. I was just making a general statement.