I still don't know what you mean by this part:
"Further arguing that the idea of any lack of action with regards to suffering (or other perceived lack) is a reflection of the reality of that (individual) consciousness."
Which part are you having trouble understanding the meaning?
Suffering is perceptual, and/or a judgment about the 'reality' of someone. Could be own self. I could judge (or fully believe, based on perceptual evidence) that I am a person suffering. I understand your argument that if God(s) don't do something (anything) with regards to my suffering, that is perceptible to me (or anyone), then that would be clear indication of inaction, and therefore just as plausible to suggest there are no gods in relation to my suffering as there is to say gods exists, but due to my/our theistic understandings they are in state of inaction and yada yada yada, that doesn't mean they don't exist. That's how I understand position of this thread.
To me, it is making assumptions about "suffering" and "action" which if they are going to be scrutinized at level you are calling forth, ought to be addressed at level of what are these conceptual understandings (really) in terms of fundamental understandings? Beyond just mere (dictionary) definitions, who is the determiner, how is it being determined this is occurring (or not)? As a theist who's visited this topic before, I understand it to be a reflection of one's consciousness. Essentially any thought. Not just the theistic belief is a reflection of one's understanding of reality, but existence itself is, as is suffering as is action/inaction when it comes to most conceptual ideas. Glad to explain all this on side tangents if truly not understanding the words being used, but just assume deal with what you are speaking to.
Existence is God. That is my position in this thread. The inaction of existence itself to do anything with regards to the perception of suffering is, I would argue, necessarily a reflection on the consciousness of the one thinking this thought.
As a theist with further understandings than that point, I feel quite capable to go on from here, explain more. I pause to see (again) if this so far is making sense. And so far each time I convey this, you are showing up as - I understand none of it.
