Jim
Nets of Wonder
I’m interested in what people are saying on all sides, and what their reasons are for thinking that way. People calling their views “science,” “scientific” and “evidence based,” and calling their reasons “evidence,” doesn’t communicate any information to me about what they’re thinking, or their reasons for thinking it. All it does is lower their credibility with me. It’s no different to me from people calling their views “what God says.”So you don't believe that if something is evidence based.....such as vaccines against polio......you don't think you should accept such thinking. How do you think? Anecdotal based? Your gut thinking?
Or you simply just do not think.
Last edited: