• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Human Rights Commission targets 'overly broad' Religious Discrimination Bill“

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
‘The chief body in charge of promoting human rights in Australia has warned protections instigated by the Morrison government’s controversial Religious Discrimination Bill could come at the expense of others.

The Human Rights Commission has outlined its fears over these potential “undesirable consequences” in a submission to Attorney-General Christian Porter, as the window for consultation on the draft legislation nears its end.

While supporting much of the draft laws, the Commission alleges there are a series of fundamental flaws in its current state, citing concerns over providing protection to religious belief or activity at an "unintended" cost.

”The Commission has advocated for more than 20 years for a Bill to protect against religious discrimination,” Commission President Rosalind Croucher said in its submission.

“However, it is important that our laws do not give preference to one human right over others.”

Read more here: Human Rights Commission targets 'overly broad' Religious Discrimination Bill
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
‘The chief body in charge of promoting human rights in Australia has warned protections instigated by the Morrison government’s controversial Religious Discrimination Bill could come at the expense of others.

The Human Rights Commission has outlined its fears over these potential “undesirable consequences” in a submission to Attorney-General Christian Porter, as the window for consultation on the draft legislation nears its end.

While supporting much of the draft laws, the Commission alleges there are a series of fundamental flaws in its current state, citing concerns over providing protection to religious belief or activity at an "unintended" cost.

”The Commission has advocated for more than 20 years for a Bill to protect against religious discrimination,” Commission President Rosalind Croucher said in its submission.

“However, it is important that our laws do not give preference to one human right over others.”

Read more here: Human Rights Commission targets 'overly broad' Religious Discrimination Bill
I found the article to be only partially informative, because it cited concerns about some legislation but provided no link to the proposed legislation nor specified much about it. For the length of the article I expected more content and some discussion about related events and decisions that might explain why the legislation has been proposed in the first place. All they did was cite problems and left everything nebulous.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
I found the article to be only partially informative, because it cited concerns about some legislation but provided no link to the proposed legislation nor specified much about it.
There is a link to the HRC submission in the second paragraph, with all the technical details of their comments and the formal names of the relevant draft bills, which should make the full text fairly easy to track down.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
‘The chief body in charge of promoting human rights in Australia has warned protections instigated by the Morrison government’s controversial Religious Discrimination Bill could come at the expense of others.

The Human Rights Commission has outlined its fears over these potential “undesirable consequences” in a submission to Attorney-General Christian Porter, as the window for consultation on the draft legislation nears its end.

While supporting much of the draft laws, the Commission alleges there are a series of fundamental flaws in its current state, citing concerns over providing protection to religious belief or activity at an "unintended" cost.

”The Commission has advocated for more than 20 years for a Bill to protect against religious discrimination,” Commission President Rosalind Croucher said in its submission.

“However, it is important that our laws do not give preference to one human right over others.”

Read more here: Human Rights Commission targets 'overly broad' Religious Discrimination Bill

Governments should not treat one religion any different than any other religion. Other than that, all religion need to follow all civil laws.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
@danieldemol

This is a potentially interesting topic - can you summarize the key points of the reports you're interested in?
 
Top