• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Human Genders Around the World

The Hammer

[REDACTED]
Premium Member
Look, slippery slope arguments are perfectly, 100% valid when it comes
to moral arguments. We have it right now with the euthanasia issue in
Australia. Every "safe guard" put in place to prevent abuse is being taken
down now - by the very people who claimed the practice would not be
abused.
Same with those in the "gay movement" in the 1980's who said that the
decriminalization of homosexuality will not lead to gay marriage and
promotion of gay values - and them immediately did just this.
And last year here the voting in of gay marriage would not lead to issue
of free speech - and then starting attacking churches, employees and
free citizens who took expressed views they didn't like.

So yeah, we are already in hell in a hand basket. We just think it's
normal to be totally drug addled, divorced and having sex with dogs.


┈┈┈┈┈┈▕▔╲
┈┈┈┈┈┈┈▏▕
┈┈┈┈┈┈┈▏▕▂▂▂
▂▂▂▂▂▂╱┈▕▂▂▂▏
▉▉▉▉▉┈┈┈▕▂▂▂▏
▉▉▉▉▉┈┈┈▕▂▂▂▏
▔▔▔▔▔▔╲▂▕▂▂▂I
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
Moot point. Nothing ever returns to how it was, you either embrace change or end up bitter.

You going to support polygamy when it arrives as an issue?
I often ask people my age who "support gay marriage"
"When did you start supporting this?"
It's a highly annoying question because it forces them to
admit they once were opposed to gay marriage, but over
a ten year period changed sides.
It took five years for many to fully believe the bearded trans
lady is a woman even though he has a penis.
In other words - people are allowing their own opinions to be
shamelessly manipulated, and at a faster rate.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
AND...we are now in the lunatic zone.
A boy today cannot be a girl tomorrow and a boy the following day.

The terms "boy" and "girl" as you are presenting this in the context of not being required to put a gender on documents represents a social construct. By that I mean when we put those words down on anything but a medical document, they refer to things that are used for social reference: appearance, roles, pronouns, expectations. I have never needed to show a cop my penis to prove I am a male like it says on my driver's license. A genetic test has never been required for job applications.

These are variable things that have no real purpose on most forms.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
Polyamory, yes I would. No reason not to.

20-30 years ago there were plenty of reasons not to -
the primary one being that it was insulting to most
women. But that's all shifting now.
A Time article once tried to explain how conservatives
felt about "gay marriage."
"Conservatives feel about gay marriage the same way
Liberals feel about polygamy."
It's like you are in a boat and you don't notice the water
is slowly falling beneath you. That's how porn quietly
crept in and became mainstream.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
20-30 years ago there were plenty of reasons not to -
the primary one being that it was insulting to most
women. But that's all shifting now.
A Time article once tried to explain how conservatives
felt about "gay marriage."
"Conservatives feel about gay marriage the same way
Liberals feel about polygamy."
It's like you are in a boat and you don't notice the water
is slowly falling beneath you. That's how porn quietly
crept in and became mainstream.

Polyamory, of course, is different than polygamy.

Porn is mainstream?!
 
Top