• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How do we begin discussions on; Formations of reality outside the minds eye.

Frog

Cult of Kek.
Sing with me.
As with all mental concepts, a coexistent reality must be understood within the mind before aspects of it can begin to be seen and form in the physical reality.

The knowledge of a coexistent reality outside the mind, can be ascertained mentally or intuitively, possibly deductively.. scientifically, from the outer to inner of the mind.

But how is this information channeled.? Organically, chemically? transmission? electro magnetism?
Is It then to be understood, ascribed into writing which is formulated into the base foundations of his world view; Religions, sciences, esoterica?

The weight of a few, can rule the world of the many.

What value would his life then hold in comparison to the unaware, uninitiated or undisclosed person, and would there be any slight of balance betwixt?

Generally, how or in which way does/does not the complete knowledge of the spiritual offer the initiated/uninitiated? Does this convey any alleviation or elevation in ones own existence?

Where does this information come from? Signals?
I am more interested in our minds signal? Electro magnetism?
Or is it really just electro magnetism?
It could be that whats only measurable are those we're corporally tuned into at the present time.

How does the body meet the outer-body, eg, spirit? Is there a line or link of information between the two? DNA?


The percipient knows not the scope of what he reads. The big picture.


See picture.
Information comes from the higher down to the lower. Materialization through technology is the last and highest peak of of human evolution inside the mind.
Mans continued aspirations seeking to artificially enter materialistically into the outer higher system or lower (inter-dimensional) systems could lead to his own destruction.

So,
How do we begin discussions on; Formations of reality outside the minds eye?
 

Attachments

  • the-magician.png
    the-magician.png
    46.2 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
How does the body meet the outer-body, eg, spirit? Is there a line of information between the two?
Do not begin with presumptions. And ask one question at a time or number them. That will be easier for anyone who wants to answer your questions..
 

Frog

Cult of Kek.
Do not begin with presumptions. And ask one question at a time or number them. That will be easier for anyone who wants to answer your questions..
We all float down here. What presumptions? You want to edit my post because you fail to understand its concept? You are free to answer or reflect on any question you so wish. It so relative.
 
Last edited:

Frog

Cult of Kek.
Do not begin with presumptions
This subject matter is inequitable to your personal beliefs it would seem.
This subject matter assumes you already have a working suspicion of the outer and inner body aka, the spirit and body.
 
Last edited:

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Many scriptures are that. But, I am not interested in a heated discussion on this. Let it pass. Your post could have been more interesting (that is what attracted me in the first place), had it been structured a little better.
 
Last edited:

Skwim

Veteran Member
Sing with me.
As with all mental concepts, a coexistent reality must be understood within the mind before aspects of it can begin to be seen and form in the physical reality.

The knowledge of a coexistent reality outside the mind, can be ascertained mentally or intuitively, possibly deductively.. scientifically, from the outer to inner of the mind.

But how is this information channeled.? Organically, chemically? transmission? electro magnetism?
Is It then to be understood, ascribed into writing which is formulated into the base foundations of his world view; Religions, sciences, esoterica?

The weight of a few, can rule the world of the many.

What value would his life then hold in comparison to the unaware, uninitiated or undisclosed person. Would there be any slight of balance betwixt.

Generally, how or in which way does/does not the complete knowledge of the spiritual offer the initiated/uninitiated? Does this convey any alleviation or elevation in ones own existence?

Where does this information come from? Signals?
I am more interested in our minds signal? Electro magnetism?
Or is it really just electro magnetism?
It could be that whats only measurable are those were tuned into at the present time.

How does the body meet the outer-body, eg, spirit? Is there a line of information between the two?


The percipient knows not the scope of what he reads. The big picture.


See picture.
Information comes from the higher down to the lower. Materialization through technology is the last and highest peak of of human evolution inside the mind.
Mans continued aspirations seeking to artificially enter materialistically into the outer higher system or lower (inter-dimensional) systems could lead to his own destruction.

So,
How do we begin discussions on; Formations of reality outside the minds eye?

Consequences of Erudite Vernacular Utilized Irrespective
of Necessity: Problems with Using Long Words Needlessly

DANIEL M. OPPENHEIMER*
Princeton University, USA

SUMMARY​
Most texts on writing style encourage authors to avoid overly-complex words. However, a majority
of undergraduates admit to deliberately increasing the complexity of their vocabulary so as to give
the impression of intelligence. This paper explores the extent to which this strategy is effective.
Experiments 1–3 manipulate complexity of texts and find a negative relationship between complex-
ity and judged intelligence. This relationship held regardless of the quality of the original essay, and
irrespective of the participants’ prior expectations of essay quality. The negative impact of
complexity was mediated by processing fluency. Experiment 4 directly manipulated fluency and
found that texts in hard to read fonts are judged to come from less intelligent authors. Experiment 5
investigated discounting of fluency. When obvious causes for low fluency exist that are not relevant
to the judgement at hand, people reduce their reliance on fluency as a cue; in fact, in an effort not to
be influenced by the irrelevant source of fluency, they over-compensate and are biased in the opposite
direction. Implications and applications are discussed. Copyright
#
2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
.​
 

Frog

Cult of Kek.
H
Consequences of Erudite Vernacular Utilized Irrespective
of Necessity: Problems with Using Long Words Needlessly

DANIEL M. OPPENHEIMER*
Princeton University, USA

SUMMARY​
Most texts on writing style encourage authors to avoid overly-complex words. However, a majority
of undergraduates admit to deliberately increasing the complexity of their vocabulary so as to give
the impression of intelligence. This paper explores the extent to which this strategy is effective.
Experiments 1–3 manipulate complexity of texts and find a negative relationship between complex-
ity and judged intelligence. This relationship held regardless of the quality of the original essay, and
irrespective of the participants’ prior expectations of essay quality. The negative impact of
complexity was mediated by processing fluency. Experiment 4 directly manipulated fluency and
found that texts in hard to read fonts are judged to come from less intelligent authors. Experiment 5
investigated discounting of fluency. When obvious causes for low fluency exist that are not relevant
to the judgement at hand, people reduce their reliance on fluency as a cue; in fact, in an effort not to
be influenced by the irrelevant source of fluency, they over-compensate and are biased in the opposite
direction. Implications and applications are discussed. Copyright
#
2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
.​
Having trouble understanding just ask
Which words confuse you?
 
Top