In my opinion, the goal of any religions / philosophy is self-actualization, at least at the core. This is gone about in different ways, yet it's similar to the minor and major differences between culture. While Christians wanting to be Christ like and Setians wanting to come into being seen different to the average person, at the core they are both self-actualization. What makes a "good" religion then is one that helps followers reach this goal. I've known "true" Christians, I've known seemingly enlightened atheists, and I've known Satanists happy as can be. It's not the symbolism or belief, but the act of walking the path. So, a religion that stifles base needs like sexuality, food, etc would be "bad", or one that preaches a hostile environment of spiritual or physical warfare, etc.
Thoughts?
From Wikipedia on "self-actualization".
Thoughts?
From Wikipedia on "self-actualization".
"What a man can be, he must be."[10] This quotation forms the basis of the perceived need for self-actualization. This level of need refers to what a person's full potential is and the realization of that potential. Maslow describes this level as the desire to accomplish everything that one can, to become the most that one can be.
Last edited: