libre
Skylark
Are you subsequently a pacifist?
Realistically no war of defense, liberation, or offense could ever result in no civilian deaths.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Has killing civilians ever been justified during wartime? (e.g. Hiroshima/Nagasaki WW2)
- Thread starter an anarchist
- Start date
Realistically no war of defense, liberation, or offense could ever result in no civilian deaths.
No, I realize war can have its place in defense, but right and wrong are right and wrong. So war or any violence should always be the last resort when everything is breaking down and you're in the position to defend yourself. The decision to go to war should be treated with the upmost gravity and militaries should be highly trained to avoid civilian losses. I actually wouldn't mind if we went back to how the ancients would often do it - the king or chief would be the first into battle. Might make our elderly business suit wearing "leaders" think twice about sending working class young people off to kill and be killed, as cannon fodder.
Last edited:
There are 2 different questions being asked here in my opinion.
1. Was killing civilians justified?
2. Was the murder of civilians justified.?
1. Was killing civilians justified?
2. Was the murder of civilians justified.?