Desert Snake
Veteran Member
2 Peter 2:1
False teaching doesn't just infer some wayward teachings. It means something that can't be true, because it contradicts the real religious beliefs, how could one tell the difference? Perhaps it isn't as difficult as it seems
• A verse that literally, signifies 'Yeshua', as not all knowing, cannot be true. This means something absolute, not opinion or interpretation.
• An interpretation that does not follow the context, possibly from a bad interpretation, could be intentional.
Translation itself is something to consider. The scribes, I believe, wrote as they went about, in different languages, and later these were compiled, and were translated. If there is something that is absolutely wrong, that one reads, in the .bible, this is most likely a translation problem, and probably not intentional.
• intentional false teaching tends to follow 'belief', in other words, translating verses to mean something else, which is important, to the religion, in a consistent manner.
False teaching doesn't just infer some wayward teachings. It means something that can't be true, because it contradicts the real religious beliefs, how could one tell the difference? Perhaps it isn't as difficult as it seems
• A verse that literally, signifies 'Yeshua', as not all knowing, cannot be true. This means something absolute, not opinion or interpretation.
• An interpretation that does not follow the context, possibly from a bad interpretation, could be intentional.
Translation itself is something to consider. The scribes, I believe, wrote as they went about, in different languages, and later these were compiled, and were translated. If there is something that is absolutely wrong, that one reads, in the .bible, this is most likely a translation problem, and probably not intentional.
• intentional false teaching tends to follow 'belief', in other words, translating verses to mean something else, which is important, to the religion, in a consistent manner.
Last edited: