OtherSheep
<--@ Titangel
The False Prophet and the Wounded Beast
Revelation
13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
13:13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
13:14 And he deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by [the means of] those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
The Greek word translated as he, is translated in other places as: the, this, that, one, he, she, it, etc. [in the above verses and the one following]
The "image to the beast" could be "the mark of the beast"... who lost a war and didn't exist for a while?
19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
The Beast and the False Prophet are judged neither as nor with "every man".
Judged Every Man According To Their Works
20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
So... if the Beast and the False Prophet are not judged as/when all men will be judged, then these beasts are not two individual men, but more like an institution and the government which supports that institution.
Make sense?
To the nay-sayers: if not why not?
Revelation
13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
13:13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
13:14 And he deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by [the means of] those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
The Greek word translated as he, is translated in other places as: the, this, that, one, he, she, it, etc. [in the above verses and the one following]
The "image to the beast" could be "the mark of the beast"... who lost a war and didn't exist for a while?
19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
The Beast and the False Prophet are judged neither as nor with "every man".
Judged Every Man According To Their Works
20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
So... if the Beast and the False Prophet are not judged as/when all men will be judged, then these beasts are not two individual men, but more like an institution and the government which supports that institution.
Make sense?
To the nay-sayers: if not why not?
Last edited: