This is the false notion that creationists are ignorant and need to learn in order to become evolutionists. That is far from the truth. What should happen is the more a person learns the more they should see the problems with Darwinism and see how it doesn't make sense.
Do you honestly think the words "Darwinism" and "evolution" are interchangable or something? Or that it somehow helps your cause to try to relegate all of evolutionary science to the writings of one man? As if to put on equal grounds with the absurdity that is the bible? Did you even read my first post? Because that's what I was refering to that you wouldn't read or face. Here it is again for you to ignore yet again I suppose.
Gotta love when creationists try this crapola.
First off, as far as I know, there are no "evolutionists". There are biologists, geologists, paleontologists and so on who devote their knowledge of science to particular fields of study. Each of the different fields of study have contributed evidence to an overall theory.
Second, real scientists do not start off their studies with an absolute conclusion like creationists do. You people never seem to understand the scientific method at all. You observe, hypothesize, experiment, collect data, and see if the data matches up with what you hypothesized, adjust your theory and re-experiment and do the whole process over and over again until you have data, which over and over, confirms a well worked out theory. This is how the Theory of Evolution has come about. Not the other way around.
Creationists start with their conclusion and then take information which which suits their purposes and twist it around what they want it to mean until they can say "Here! Look at this! We were right all along!" There is no science involved in it at all. So, therefore, to say that Creationism has scientific evidence is an out and out lie.
Creationism is not validated by any evidence obtained through use of scientific method...therefore it is not scientific and has no scientific evidence. Creationists are guilty of taking data which corroborates evolution and twisting it around to mean something entirely different from what it means in order to say "I'm right I'm right I'm right!"
The Theory of Evolution is not a starting point...it is the conclusion brought about by scientists hypothesizing how certain species have come about, testing, observations, experiments and recording data over and over until their adjusted hypotheses match up with the data. The end result is a Scientific Theory. That of the ToE.
Creationism does work with creationism being the starting point and conclusion. You already have it made up in your mind that what you believe is absolutely right that you purposely look for things which you can interpret in such a way that it sort of looks like you could be on to something and that somehow validates your erroneus stance.
Fact is, you do need to learn, for you have made it quite apparent that you have completely no idea of what science really entails and how to go about using it correctly. You use other people's findings, twist them all around, and abuse them to make your own point...no matter how wrong it is.
This all makes you reallly impossible to have an honest intellectual conversation or debate with as you are utterly unwilling to learn enough about scientific methods in order to see that you, and any other creationist, aren't using them correctly, or at all really. Therefore any "evidence" you think there is or want to claim is scientific really doesn't exist as you aren't using science at all...you're bastardizing it for your own greedy gain.
