Matthew 12:25-28
The devil wouldn't cause Saul to follow Jesus and work hard to preach to others about Jesus.
Matthew of all people would never speak well of Saul, let alone justify his allegations.
Anyway, why would I need to believe jesus let alone paul?
Matthew's reasoning is flawed because he assumes that jesus (the assumed) was alive which is not something I admit in the first place!
Acts 9:7, 22:9 They all did not all have a shared hallucination. They saw the light and heard a voice not belonging to them.
I think I brought you an independent source that says the translators worked on this contradictions to reconcile it, by translating according to wishes!
even if I accept the translation, why on earth would I believe that there existed those alleged people? why are they not another of paul's imagination?
just like the 500 he mentioned in 1Corinth. 15, where are they? who are they? some of them were alive, that's fine, but have they been interrogated?
it's like saying:
I tell you I saw Elvis, 1000 people saw him in 1970, some of them are still alive ...
Does that sound like a true event? naturally NOT! .. it's just me trying to convince you, and since you have no way to really know if it happened or not, I am a happy chappy!
That's in a time when people can put lookout requests on the net, over the tele, in radios, all over the place ... In paul's days he was speaking to people who were in Corinth, he was talking about an event on the way to Damascus, how would they invetigate? they would just take it on faith! .. I don't ...
check this one please?
[Cor2 12:2][ I know a person in Christ who
fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven? whether in the body or out of the body I do not know; God knows.]
I believe this, and my name is Charles, the prince of Wales!