• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Discussion Thread: tomspug/mball Reverse Debate

tomspug

Absorbant
Hey everybody. I was curious to know what you all thought about the concept of Reverse Debate and whether or not it should be emulated in the future.

Also, you can post commentary and discussion about the actual debate here as well.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Care to describe what reverse debate is?

Tom is Christian and I am an atheist. We are tackling the problem of evil, and he is arguing the side of atheism and I'm arguing Christianity's side. The reverse is that we are taking the opposite stand as we normally would.
 

tomspug

Absorbant
In Reverse Debate, each person argues from the other person's perspective, doing their best to properly defend their side of the argument, even though the person themselves does not believe it.

To me, it is an exercise in communication in understanding. If a person does a good job in presenting an argument that they themselves do not accept, it adds to the credibility of that person and implies that they themselves can answer their own arguments. The question is whether or not the OTHER person can answer them...
 

whereismynotecard

Treasure Hunter
Tom is Christian and I am an atheist. We are tackling the problem of evil, and he is arguing the side of atheism and I'm arguing Christianity's side. The reverse is that we are taking the opposite stand as we normally would.

In Reverse Debate, each person argues from the other person's perspective, doing their best to properly defend their side of the argument, even though the person themselves does not believe it.

To me, it is an exercise in communication in understanding. If a person does a good job in presenting an argument that they themselves do not accept, it adds to the credibility of that person and implies that they themselves can answer their own arguments. The question is whether or not the OTHER person can answer them...

He he!! That is cool. Yeah, I think you guys should do that... It would be fun.
 

rheff78

I'm your huckleberry.
I used to do this in my ethics class in college. I would always write about the opposite of what I believed.
 
Top