This shows a weakness; there isn't a superior, comparison is the start of disease...
There is only comprehension of opposites; if you fight or rise one up as better, this limits the perception.
Going to start a thread on form vs formlessness; as 0neness (Heaven) is a place of formless pure consciousness, where form is something created.
Thus in following a load of form based practises, to remove form based ideas, is not removing boundaries.
Belief is a weak form of actually knowing.
Thus to the enlightened mind, as explained in the
Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra; when we've become conscious of the universal mind (Brahman without a name), there is no belief of the uncreated, it is experienced.
The Bodhisattva are those who've gone beyond this realm of consciousness (Tathāgata), then chosen to remain in a world of form, for the benefit of others within the Maya.
Fighting the idea that things are created, in a manifest world isn't understanding; everything is made manifest by the CPU, therefore none of it is real, recognizing that really we're the infinite mind sitting in a place of formlessness, experiencing form for understanding, is the whole point in any of it being here.
It is very hard to learn without us having experiences in a physical form in a linear timeline.
Listening to Buddha being 'against' everything; shows something that doesn't resemble the enlightened mind.... It is about recognizing the middle line.
Buddha was having to reiterate God without a self, without a form, without a need of being; as it had become tainted by bad wording in Hinduism, that was mainly based on conjecture, and not from first hand experience.
Buddha wasn't saying do away with God; just to become part of it, within its infinite state of formlessness without the need of self.