I had a conversation on this recently with someone conflating the Eiffel Tower and God. As in, why did I believe in the Eiffel Tower, but not God.
I went with...
"Touching it worked pretty well, but I was a 'believer' in it previously.
That belief didn't really impact on my life, and so it was more loosely examined than my beliefs in other areas. The reason for the belief was the enormous amount of data I had come across (without even trying) which showed the Eiffel Tower in a completely consistent manner, in the same location, with the same properties, appearing at the same time. Further, dependant on the exact timing of the evidence, there was consistency with the world around the Eiffel Tower as well."
To some extent, this seems consistent with what you guys are suggesting here. Multiple independent sources of information, cross-checked against each other.