1. In Kitabal Itqaan, Du'a Nudbah is quoted heavily. In that prayer from Imam Mahdi (a) about Imam Mahdi (a), we read "You have the position to me as Aaron does to Moses except that there is no Prophet after me". We also read about if we can arrange a meeting with Imam Mahdi (a) and that he finds a way to meet us. We also read that for every people there is a guide interpreted in a way to imply Ali (A) is the guide after Mohammad (s) and the earth is never left without a Guide from God. We also read that there is always a Baqiyatallah (remainder of God) in a household of guidance at all times. We talk directly to Imam Mahdi (A) in Du'a Nudbah as well as to God. So he proves he is alive.
2. "seal of Anbiya" doesn't mean Mohammad (s) is the last, because all Nabis (a) are first and last Nabis (a), meaning Adam (a) is also the last Nabi frankly, is sophistry. If God can't say Mohammad (s) is the last Nabi in any shape and form, to inform us there is no Nabi after Mohammad (s) because sophistry can be played with any arrangements of words, then it doesn't make sense. That means no matter how God says it whatever way God says it, it's going to be denied on this basis.
3. Every Nabi or Rasool has an Ahlulbayt. This is found in Quran, they come in groups related to each other spiritually yes, but also to stop forgery and fake Prophets and Imams and limit who can attempt to fake their status, it makes it that succession is always blood related. Bab and Baha'allah were not blood related, and Baha'allah's children eventually came to Islam and succession couldn't continue in his offspring. This is a sign of a false Prophet per Quran.
4. Isa (a) is not the day of judgment of Musa (a) even by his day of judgment concept. Let's say era of Mohammad, includes his successors, and then Baha'allah is the day of rising and judgment for Mohammad's (s) era, by this notion, Isa (a) is not a day of judgment of Musa because it would be like saying one of the twelve successors of Mohammad (s) is the day of judgment of Mohammad (s). Successors are under the "covenant" of the founder, Isa (a) was end of line of successors, and not a founder like Musa (a). So he fails even per his own explanation of day of judgment to get it right.
5. The day of judgment is a day where everyone is certain of God's existence Prophets and know they are right per Quran and that there is no room for repentance that day and nothing will be accepted for exchange and no intercession will benefit except souls who already believed in the signs and did good. It's a day where no soul can control for another soul and the whole matter is in God's hand. It's a day when finally hell will take it's full reality while even in the life after death, it's not fully manifest, and people still don't know reality fully though they are punished in grave, it's no where perceivable as in the day of judgment level. This is so clear in the Quran, to deny judgment day, is full dishonesty to Quran. To interpret the Bahai way, is to fall in the realms of sophistry to Quran to a next new level and not let Quran explain itself.
6. There is Twelve Successors to founders always per Quran and hadiths. The Bab doesn't have twelve successors.
7. There is no Guide in the moment on earth per Bahais, and so this contradicts so many hadiths that say there is a guide on earth and also contradicts Quran which shows there is a witness and driver of souls and leader and guide and caller to God in all times.
8. There are mistakes, like Baha'allah interpretation of Mohammad (s) connecting reality verse in Surah Ana'aam, it shows he didn't understand it and made up some silly absurd meaning to it.
9. Stoning is taught that it was once allowed or taught by the Prophet per Baha'allah, while Quran shows it was never allowed so he verifies false hadiths often like this that contradict Quran.
10. Mohammad (s) and his family (a) are the best of creation per Quran and ahadith, and so it doesn't make sense not to end with them.
11. Circumstantial evidence is used, for example hadiths of the Mahdi bringing a new religion, yet other hadiths explain that it's because it's been corrupted so much that when he brings the teachings of Mohammad (s) and Quran back in truth, it seems like a new religion. The Quran is also like a new book when he revives it and brings it's explanation. They only show the hadiths about new religion while ignoring the many that explain them. This makes it circumstantial evidence but it's half truths as well. We also have hadiths that there is no book after Quran (many of them) in explaining the seal of Prophets (a) verse.
12. The Imams (a) would have emphasized on seal of Anbiya not to mean end of Anbiya, if it was the case, but they did the opposite, they emphasized there is no new book after Quran due to it.
2. "seal of Anbiya" doesn't mean Mohammad (s) is the last, because all Nabis (a) are first and last Nabis (a), meaning Adam (a) is also the last Nabi frankly, is sophistry. If God can't say Mohammad (s) is the last Nabi in any shape and form, to inform us there is no Nabi after Mohammad (s) because sophistry can be played with any arrangements of words, then it doesn't make sense. That means no matter how God says it whatever way God says it, it's going to be denied on this basis.
3. Every Nabi or Rasool has an Ahlulbayt. This is found in Quran, they come in groups related to each other spiritually yes, but also to stop forgery and fake Prophets and Imams and limit who can attempt to fake their status, it makes it that succession is always blood related. Bab and Baha'allah were not blood related, and Baha'allah's children eventually came to Islam and succession couldn't continue in his offspring. This is a sign of a false Prophet per Quran.
4. Isa (a) is not the day of judgment of Musa (a) even by his day of judgment concept. Let's say era of Mohammad, includes his successors, and then Baha'allah is the day of rising and judgment for Mohammad's (s) era, by this notion, Isa (a) is not a day of judgment of Musa because it would be like saying one of the twelve successors of Mohammad (s) is the day of judgment of Mohammad (s). Successors are under the "covenant" of the founder, Isa (a) was end of line of successors, and not a founder like Musa (a). So he fails even per his own explanation of day of judgment to get it right.
5. The day of judgment is a day where everyone is certain of God's existence Prophets and know they are right per Quran and that there is no room for repentance that day and nothing will be accepted for exchange and no intercession will benefit except souls who already believed in the signs and did good. It's a day where no soul can control for another soul and the whole matter is in God's hand. It's a day when finally hell will take it's full reality while even in the life after death, it's not fully manifest, and people still don't know reality fully though they are punished in grave, it's no where perceivable as in the day of judgment level. This is so clear in the Quran, to deny judgment day, is full dishonesty to Quran. To interpret the Bahai way, is to fall in the realms of sophistry to Quran to a next new level and not let Quran explain itself.
6. There is Twelve Successors to founders always per Quran and hadiths. The Bab doesn't have twelve successors.
7. There is no Guide in the moment on earth per Bahais, and so this contradicts so many hadiths that say there is a guide on earth and also contradicts Quran which shows there is a witness and driver of souls and leader and guide and caller to God in all times.
8. There are mistakes, like Baha'allah interpretation of Mohammad (s) connecting reality verse in Surah Ana'aam, it shows he didn't understand it and made up some silly absurd meaning to it.
9. Stoning is taught that it was once allowed or taught by the Prophet per Baha'allah, while Quran shows it was never allowed so he verifies false hadiths often like this that contradict Quran.
10. Mohammad (s) and his family (a) are the best of creation per Quran and ahadith, and so it doesn't make sense not to end with them.
11. Circumstantial evidence is used, for example hadiths of the Mahdi bringing a new religion, yet other hadiths explain that it's because it's been corrupted so much that when he brings the teachings of Mohammad (s) and Quran back in truth, it seems like a new religion. The Quran is also like a new book when he revives it and brings it's explanation. They only show the hadiths about new religion while ignoring the many that explain them. This makes it circumstantial evidence but it's half truths as well. We also have hadiths that there is no book after Quran (many of them) in explaining the seal of Prophets (a) verse.
12. The Imams (a) would have emphasized on seal of Anbiya not to mean end of Anbiya, if it was the case, but they did the opposite, they emphasized there is no new book after Quran due to it.
Last edited: