Anyone interested in Jung?

[crossfire]

Individuation, archtypes, Shadow work, etc?

If so, please see the poll in the mystics section.

(I'd like to start some Jungian threads....)

Thank you!

 

[Yadon]

He was a quack, to put it simply.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

You know I'm interested, crossfire!

 

[Gjallarhorn]

He was a quack, to put it simply.

A quack scientifically, but his ideas are still useful magically.

 

[Darkness]

I am a Freud man myself.

 

[crossfire]

Since it seems the members who are most knowledgeable in Jung are LHP, I might just start posting Jungian threads here for discussion so I can learn more. However, since this a blue DIR, I might need someone to adopt me as their contrarian mutant aunt, cousin, or niece, (depending on how old you are,) who has her own style/approach to individuation.

If anyone objects, just tell me to buzz off, and I will.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Since it seems the members who are most knowledgeable in Jung are LHP, I might just start posting Jungian threads here for discussion so I can learn more. However, since this a blue DIR, I might need someone to adopt me as their contrarian mutant aunt, cousin, or niece, (depending on how old you are,) who has her own style/approach to individuation.

If anyone objects, just tell me to buzz off, and I will.

Crossfire, no one's ever had a problem with you posting here.

 

[1137]

Love Jung, am doing my best to find a way to modernize his now semi-ridiculous views.