• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

American intervention in Korea

Did American involvement in the Korean war accomplish the greater good in your opinion?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 36.8%
  • No

    Votes: 12 63.2%

  • Total voters
    19

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Did American involvement in the Korean war accomplish the greater good in your opinion?
North-Korea_240-animated-flag-gifs.gif

South-Korea_240-animated-flag-gifs.gif
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Some here need to read the history of American involvement in Korea, it was bloody and mostly unnecessary.
Hardly. It was the North Korean Communists that started the war by invading South Korea by crossing the 38th parallel equipped with Soviet armor and weaponry.

The US intervention was to aid South Korea in pushing the Reds back out of South Korea.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Hardly. It was the North Korean Communists that started the war by invading South Korea by crossing the 38th parallel equipped with Soviet armor and weaponry.

The US intervention was to aid South Korea in pushing the Reds back out of South Korea.

Well, he was right to more than a point. Yes, we needed to get in when North Korea invaded. Our mistake was to try to eliminate North Korea as a country. The eviction of North Korea from South Korea was amazingly rapid. The retreated at least as fast as they initially advanced. We got cocky. We pushed back. In fact my father was involved at that point. He was a Marine and was in the Battle of the Chosin Reservoir:

Battle of Chosin Reservoir - Wikipedia

Percentage wise it was one of the highest percentage of casualties in the history of the Marines. It was a Pyrrhic victory for the Chinese, they had far worse casualties than we had.

In hindsight if we had stopped at the original border, which is roughly where the war ended, we would have avoided over 90% of the casualties that we had.
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
Well, he was right to more than a point. Yes, we needed to get in when North Korea invaded. Our mistake was to try to eliminate North Korea as a country. The eviction of North Korea from South Korea was amazingly rapid. The retreated at least as fast as they initially advanced. We got cocky. We pushed back. In fact my father was involved at that point. He was a Marine and was in the Battle of the Chosin Reservoir:

Battle of Chosin Reservoir - Wikipedia

Percentage wise it was one of the highest percentage of casualties in the history of the Marines. It was a Pyrrhic victory for the Chinese, they had far worse casualties than we had.

In hindsight if we had stopped at the original border, which is roughly where the war ended, we would have avoided over 90% of the casualties that we had.

Hindsight is 20/20.

If US was successful in its goal, then I bet lots of North Koreans would be very grateful today.
 

Grandliseur

Well-Known Member
Did American involvement in the Korean war accomplish the greater good in your opinion?
The powers that be should have gone with the MacArthur plan, nuke the Chinese into going back to their own and thus having cleaned up that mess. We would have had a different world if done. No NK, no belligerent China, etc.
 

LionLooking

Member
The powers that be should have gone with the MacArthur plan, nuke the Chinese into going back to their own and thus having cleaned up that mess.
I think the USSR would have retaliated.
We would have had a different world if done. No NK, no belligerent China, etc.
That's right, a very different wordl. A nuclear waste ground in fact.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
That would be the greatest if them two could duke it out.
The way it's looking, it just might be the case.

I think we should invoke Queensberry rules instead of putting other people's lives on the line.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
That's right, a very different wordl. A nuclear waste ground in fact.

Huh? The PRC didn't have nuclear weapons till the late 60s and the USSR was a paper tiger when it came to nuclear weapons.
They could hardly transport them inside the USSR, let alone use them for an attack.

The US could've nuked anyone without repercussions.
 
Top