Segev Moran
Well-Known Member
So you would say that God is Nothing?It is relevant. If you have a 'nothing' in the equation, before matter /matter in the universe/, then you have the subject of cause, etc.
If God really exists, It means that God is Something..
Something we can't understand.. but it is something, Thus (I'll give it to you in Craig style:
1. If God exists, God is something
2. God cannot have been created as it is always been
3. So.. There was always something.
Thus, the question of nothing is irrelevant.
If you'll try the Atheist approach:
Nothing is subjective and can be defined in relevant to its context.
Nothing can't represent Lack of matter.
It can represent An empty box
It can represent Vacuum,
And so on.
(Same goes for "God", BTW)
I Agree... It has no relevance to either Atheist or Theists,If it isn't relevant, then it has no relevance to atheism, either. You are mistaking the position of atheism, here, with non-position.
Not in its literal sense.
And what exactly is the Atheist position?
Let's say that there is "Nothing" and We all came from "Nothing" (or whatever you choose to call that nothing)...Any time the atheism is presented as an oppositional to theism, you have the relevance of cause, etc.
How does that imply to a "Cause" in the "Life meaning" way?