There are no lines of logic that would support a gods existence.
On the flip side, there is a mountain of feelings and beliefs that many would use to support their gods existence.
Perhaps, but the 'bad' scientists are weeded out quickly if their work exhibited anything less than rigor, accuracy and honesty.
Notice that the Piltdown was eventually shown to be a fraud by scientists, not Church members.
"The Piltdown case is a strong example of how racial, nationalist, and...
Actually, it suggests that humans can reason that murder, theft, rape, oppression are not acts they would want committed on them, hence they shouldn't commit them on others.
It has nothing to do with how far back the bible goes, it's all about how accurate it is based on "oral tradition"
Do the...
They might learn the earth is flat, the sun moon and stars revolve around it and magical sky fairies created everything. At least, that's what men learned from just sitting and observing centuries ago.
All you've accomplished is to re-labeled the 'natural laws' of our universe by calling them "Natures Intelligence". How does that help us to understand anything better than before?
Such as what?
That's obviously baloney because it isn't supported in any way.
Sorry, but only the former is true, the latter is not.
That's called delusion.
That might be relevant if indeed our conscience's were aligned with the bible, but they're not.
That only goes to show just how inaccurate the bible should be, ever heard of Chinese Whispers?
The various religions don't teach the same "core morality" at all. They all have varying and often...
LOL! It's highly unlikely Hitchens could have endeavored to do what the Jews and Muslims have already accomplished in spades over centuries of hatred and intolerance towards each other simply due to their religious beliefs.