Sounds good.
I was tired of your obsession of hell anyway. And its not good to talk to anyone who's mental health is so easily broken.
So I'm glad you told me.
Wanting to know a specific God and wanting to know God are 2 different things.
So thats the question I've asked you or put to you.
Do you have expectations on who God is?
And you answered here by saying God should be everything you are, other wise there is no reason to worship him.
How the hell...
It is an in person experience and you are already expressing your beliefs about God regardless. Weather you think you are or not and this is why.
You want to meet God and have wanted to since you were 9?
There has to be a reason you haven't and to some degree you have guessed what that is. My...
This is where you're projecting your own ideas into the context of the OP.
You're saying that if people dont know about God they get into Heaven and that is reason enough for you not to tell anyone.
But the OP never says anything about people going to Heaven if they dont know about it.
And I...
So, we're steering this conversation down the course of what your beliefs are now?
In other words, you asked the question to show me something in the answer you believe I'll give?
Thats a question, which Im sure you'll be really happy to answer once I answer your question.
You would have to...
I dont know what to say. You just pulled a bunch of stuff out of your butt there and kind of invited me to engage you in your butt words.
Are you prompting me to correct you?
Because the only correction I have is for you to not project an entire belief system thats been pulled straight from...
No, Im blaming you for your judgmental attitude.
Fire and brimstone comes from your insight as the person you are and not from any where else.
And if you think you need to quote scripture to prove your point, then you're not seeing the OP in what it was meant to be but rather looking to explain...
So, what you're trying to say is, that you would be understanding of people who didn't believe you?
I kind of got that the first time. Still didn't even come close to answering the question I asked you. Not even in the vicinity of halfway to close.
If you knew that the information you had...
You suppose correct... duh.
Must be with yourself at least.
Because you kind of proved it by being an ******* with your response and if it isn't that you meant to be an ******* then I would have to say that there aren't to many things you get right off the bat.
There's a definition for what I...
Thats funny you use those words. "I certainly wouldn't condemn"
Let us expand on the idea in the OP.
The idea is an expansion of knowledge.
People are constantly growing and we use examples to describe that growth like, "Dont judge me on my past, I dont live there any more"
Growth normally...
Yup, someone started a thread a lot like this one and asked, (Atheist what if?) but I believe they did it wrong.
The right way to ask that question in these particular forums I believe would be as follows.
If you had (personal) knowledge of Gods existence and the only proof you had couldn't be...
Think so. Could have misread something.
As far as I know you simply said "other processes" or something like that.
To which I said, they're not reliable.
Let me get this straight as you've stated in this post and others.
The objects, like a hat, boot and including trees, can only become...
Back pedaling is asking questions like, how much carbon 14 is in a fossil.
If it wasn't a question based on assumption then maybe you could just answer it and end the assumptions.
Yes.
Other methods that are just as questionable and that still doesn't answer why carbon 14 is even found in dinosaur bones. Other then, it seeped in somehow. There is no evidence to show how it got there.
These aren't underwater.
Actually "anything" past a certain age gives anomalous readings so it proves nothing. That's why creationist ignore it. But they do tell you about it. Which evolutionist don't. The only argument evolutionist make is the one they choose to.
Except that there are sections of forest with...
Funny you should mention ignorance.
The same reasons should make carbon 14 dating useless for dating anything.
There's carbon 14 in coal.
But yet, it isn't considered useless and is still used to make the argument you're making.
If not, how do YOU explain fossils?